Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26358100›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2016

DNA barcoding and molecular evolution of mosquito vectors of medical and veterinary importance.

Kadarkarai Murugan, Chithravel Vadivalagan, Pushparaj Karthika, Chellasamy Panneerselvam, Manickam Paulpandi, Jayapal Subramaniam, Hui Wei, Al Thabiani Aziz, Mohamad Saleh Alsalhi, Sandhanasamy Devanesan and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anthropophagy and Ecological Bridges: Blood-Meal Patterns of InvasiveTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  2. Mitogenomic analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. First Description of the Mitogenome Features ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kadarkarai MuruganDivision of Entomology, Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641 046, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chithravel VadivalaganDivision of Entomology, Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641 046, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pushparaj KarthikaDepartment of Zoology, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore, 641 043, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chellasamy PanneerselvamDivision of Entomology, Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641 046, Tamil Nadu, India.
Manickam PaulpandiDivision of Entomology, Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641 046, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jayapal SubramaniamDivision of Entomology, Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, 641 046, Tamil Nadu, India.
Hui WeiInstitute of Plant Protection, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, 350013, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Al Thabiani AzizFaculty of Science, Department of Biology, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, 71491, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamad Saleh AlsalhiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Sandhanasamy DevanesanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Marcello NicolettiDepartment of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Rajaiah ParamasivanCentre for Research in Medical Entomology, Madurai, India.
Megha N ParajuleeTexas A&M University System/Agri Life Research and Extension Center, Lubbock, TX, 79403, USA.
Giovanni BenelliDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy. g.benelli@sssup.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are a key threat for millions of people worldwide, since they act as vectors for devastating pathogens and parasites. The standard method of utilisation of morphological characters becomes challenging due to various factors such as phenotypical variations. We explored the complementary approach of CO1 gene-based identification, analysing ten species of mosquito vectors belonging to three genera, Aedes, Culex and Anopheles from India. Analysed nucleotide sequences were found without pseudo genes and indels; they match with high similarity in nucleotide Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn) search. The partial CO1 sequence of Anopheles niligricus was the first time record submitted to National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Mean intra- and interspecies divergence was found to be 1.30 and 3.83 %, respectively. The congeneric divergence was three times higher than the conspecifics. Deep intraspecific divergence was noted in three of the species, and the reason could be explained more accurately in the future by improving the sample size across different locations. The transitional and transversional substitutions were tested individually. Ts and Tv substitutions in all the 1st, 2nd and 3rd codons were estimated to be (0.44, 99.51), (40.35, 59.66) and (59.16, 40.84), respectively. Saturation of the sequences was resolved, since both the Ts and Tv exhibited a linear relationship suggesting that the sequences were not saturated. NJ and ML tree analysis showed that the individuals of the same species clustered together based on the CO1 sequence similarity, regardless of their collection site and geographic location. Overall, this study adds basic knowledge to molecular evolution of mosquito vectors of medical and veterinary importance and may be useful to improve biotechnological tools employed in Culicidae control programmes.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEvolution, MolecularGenes, MitochondrialAedesAnimalsAnophelesBase SequenceCluster AnalysisCulexCulicidaeCyclooxygenase 1DNA, MitochondrialGenetic MarkersHumansIndiaInsect VectorsCyclooxygenase 1DNA, MitochondrialGenetic MarkersAedesAnophelesArbovirusCO1CulexDengueMalariaMolecular ecologyMosquito-borne diseasesPhylogeny

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.