Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26357896›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2015

Nebulised hypertonic saline (3%) among children with mild to moderately severe bronchiolitis--a double blind randomized controlled trial.

Aayush Khanal, Arun Sharma, Srijana Basnet, Pushpa Raj Sharma, Fakir Chandra Gami

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Comparison of Kristjansson Respiratory Score and Wang Respiratory Score in infants with bronchiolitis in a hospital emergency department.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aayush KhanalDepartment of Pediatrics, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj-44600, P.O. Box 1524, Kathmandu, Nepal. aayush_khanal@iom.edu.np.
Arun SharmaDepartment of Pediatrics, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj-44600, P.O. Box 1524, Kathmandu, Nepal. docarunsharma@hotmail.com.
Srijana BasnetDepartment of Pediatrics, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj-44600, P.O. Box 1524, Kathmandu, Nepal. drsrijanabasnet@yahoo.com.
Pushpa Raj SharmaDepartment of Pediatrics, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj-44600, P.O. Box 1524, Kathmandu, Nepal. pushparaj.sharma@gmail.com.
Fakir Chandra GamiDepartment of Pediatrics, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj-44600, P.O. Box 1524, Kathmandu, Nepal. fakirgami@hotmail.com.
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo Assess the efficacy of nebulised hypertonic saline (HS) (3%) among children with mild to moderately severe bronchiolitis.

methodsInfants aged 6 weeks to 24 months, with a first episode of wheezing and Clinical Severity scores (Arch Dis Child 67:289-93, 1992) between 1 and 8, were enrolled over 4 months duration. Those with severe disease, co-morbidities, prior wheezing, recent bronchodilator and steroid use were excluded. Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion, to receive two doses of nebulized 3% HS (Group 1) or 0.9% normal saline (Group 2) with 1.5 mg of L-Epineprine, delivered 30 min apart. Parents were contacted at 24 h and 7 days. The principal outcome measure was the mean change in clinical severity score at the end of 2 h of observation.

resultsA total of 100 infants (mean age 9.6 months, range 2-23 months; 61 % males) were enrolled. Patients in both groups had mild to moderately severe disease at presentation. On an intention-to-treat basis, the infants in the HS group had a significant reduction (3.57 ± 1.41) in the mean clinical severity score compared to those in the NS group (2.26 ± 1.15); [p < 0.001; CI: 0.78-1.82]. More children in the HS group (n = 35/50; 70.0%) were eligible for ER/OPD discharge at the end of 2 h than those in the NS group (n = 15/50; 30%; p < 0.001), and less likely to need a hospital re-visit (n = 5/50; 10.0%) in the next 24 h as compared to the NS group (n = 15/50, 30.0%; p < 0.001). The treatment was well tolerated, with no adverse effects.

conclusionsNebulized 3% HS is effective, safe and superior to normal saline for outpatient management of infants with mild to moderately severe viral bronchiolitis in improving Clinical Severity Scores, facilitating early Out-Patient Department discharge and preventing hospital re-visits and admissions in the 24 h of presentation.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCTID012766821. Registered on January 12, 2011.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationBronchiolitis, ViralBronchodilator AgentsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEmergency Service, HospitalEpinephrineFemaleHumansInfantMaleNebulizers and VaporizersSaline Solution, HypertonicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeBronchodilator AgentsEpinephrineSaline Solution, Hypertonic

Identifiers

PMID26357896
PMCPMC4644020
OpenAlexW1877502444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.