Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26357665›Full record

ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2015

A Digital Architecture for a Network-Based Learning Health System: Integrating Chronic Care Management, Quality Improvement, and Research.

Keith Marsolo, Peter A Margolis, Christopher B Forrest, Richard B Colletti, John J Hutton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The role of co-production in Learning Health Systems.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keith MarsoloCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Peter A MargolisCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.
Christopher B ForrestChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Richard B CollettiUniversity of Vermont.
John J HuttonCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Funding

Building Modular Pediatric Chronic Disease Registries for QI and CE ResearchR01HS020024 · AHRQ · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI HUTTON, JOHN J · 2010 to 2010
$11.7M
Enhancing the Sustainability of a Pediatric Learning Health SystemR01HS022974 · AHRQ · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MARGOLIS, PETER A · 2013 to 2013
$737k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS020024AHRQ HHS R01 HS022974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe collaborated with the ImproveCareNow Network to create a proof-of-concept architecture for a network-based Learning Health System. This collaboration involved transitioning an existing registry to one that is linked to the electronic health record (EHR), enabling a "data in once" strategy. We sought to automate a series of reports that support care improvement while also demonstrating the use of observational registry data for comparative effectiveness research. DESCRIPTION OF ARCHITECTURE: We worked with three leading EHR vendors to create EHR-based data collection forms. We automated many of ImproveCareNow's analytic reports and developed an application for storing protected health information and tracking patient consent. Finally, we deployed a cohort identification tool to support feasibility studies and hypothesis generation. There is ongoing uptake of the system. To date, 31 centers have adopted the EHR-based forms and 21 centers are uploading data to the registry. Usage of the automated reports remains high and investigators have used the cohort identification tools to respond to several clinical trial requests. SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE USE: The current process for creating EHR-based data collection forms requires groups to work individually with each vendor. A vendor-agnostic model would allow for more rapid uptake. We believe that interfacing network-based registries with the EHR would allow them to serve as a source of decision support. Additional standards are needed in order for this vision to be achieved, however.

conclusionsWe have successfully implemented a proof-of-concept Learning Health System while providing a foundation on which others can build. We have also highlighted opportunities where sponsors could help accelerate progress.

Indexed as

electronic health recordslearning health systemlearning networksregistries

Identifiers

PMID26357665
PMCPMC4562738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.