Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26356697›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2015

Nodal Basin Recurrence After Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in 2653 Patients.

Lutz Kretschmer, Hans Peter Bertsch, Antonia Zapf, Christina Mitteldorf, Imke Satzger, Kai-Martin Thoms, Bernward Völker, Michael Peter Schön, Ralf Gutzmer, Hans Starz

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: a single-surgeon experience.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lutz KretschmerFrom the Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Georg August University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, D-37075 Göttingen (LK, HPB, KMT, MPS); Department of Medical Statistics, Georg August University of Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32 37073 Göttingen (AZ); Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany (IS, BV, RG); Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Klinikum Hildesheim GmbH, Senator-Braun-Allee 33, 31135 Hildesheim, Germany (CM); and Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Klinikum Augsburg, Germany, Sauerbruchstr. 6, D-86179 Augsburg (HS).
Hans Peter Bertsch
Antonia Zapf
Christina Mitteldorf
Imke Satzger
Kai-Martin Thoms
Bernward Völker
Michael Peter Schön
Ralf Gutzmer
Hans Starz
Milwaukee Public Schools · USUniversity of Hildesheim · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DECreative Commons · USUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe objective of this study was to analyze different types of nodal basin recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsKaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to study 2653 patients from 3 German melanoma centers retrospectively.The estimated 5-year negative predictive value of SLNB was 96.4%. The estimated false-negative (FN) rates after 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years were 2.5%, 4.6%, 6.4%, 8.7%, and 12.6%, respectively. Independent factors associated with false negativity were older age, fewer SLNs excised, and head or neck location of the primary tumor. Compared with SLN-positive patients, the FNs had a significantly lower survival. In SLN-positive patients undergoing completion lymphadenectomy (CLND), the 5-year nodal basin recurrence rate was 18.3%. The recurrence rates for axilla, groin, and neck were 17.2%, 15.5%, and 44.1%, respectively. Significant factors predicting local relapse after CLND were older age, head, or neck location of the primary tumor, ulceration, deeper penetration of the metastasis into the SLN, tumor-positive CLND, and >2 lymph node metastases. All kinds of nodal relapse were associated with a higher prevalence of in-transit metastases.The FN rate after SLNB steadily increases over the observation period and should, therefore, be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. False-negativity is associated with fewer SLNs excised. The beneficial effect of CLND on nodal basin disease control varies considerably across different risk groups. This should be kept in mind about SLN-positive patients when individual decisions on prophylactic CLND are taken.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMelanomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID26356697
PMCPMC4616624
OpenAlexW2332367218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.