ArticleHuman brain mapping2015
Developmental evaluation of atypical auditory sampling in dyslexia: Functional and structural evidence.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- EEG correlates of developmental dyslexia: a systematic review.Annals of dyslexia · 2023Pooled it
- The use of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques to improve reading difficulties in dyslexia: A systematic review.Human brain mapping · 2022Pooled it
- Functional Brain Connectivity of Language Functions in Children Revealed by EEG and MEG: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Pooled it
- Differences in sleep EEG coherence and spindle metrics in toddlers with and without receptive/expressive language delay: a prospective observational study.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Observational
- An examination of cortical thickness relationships within the reading network of adults.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Fast and Slow Rhythms of Naturalistic Reading Revealed by Combined Eye-Tracking and Electroencephalography.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Neural synchronization and intervention in pre-readers who later on develop dyslexia.The European journal of neuroscience · 2023Article
- Sensory temporal sampling in time: an integrated model of the TSF and neural noise hypothesis as an etiological pathway for dyslexia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Neural detection of changes in amplitude rise time in infancy.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- Reduced Theta Sampling in Infants at Risk for Dyslexia across the Sensitive Period of Native Phoneme Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Development of Atypical Reading at Ages 5 to 9 Years and Processing of Speech Envelope Modulations in the Brain.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Brain Source Correlates of Speech Perception and Reading Processes in Children With and Without Reading Difficulties.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Hearing thresholds elevation and potential association with emotional problems among 1,914 children in Beijing, China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The Neurological Basis of Developmental Dyslexia and Related Disorders: A Reappraisal of the Temporal Hypothesis, Twenty Years on.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Speech-Brain Frequency Entrainment of Dyslexia with and without Phonological Deficits.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Development of neural oscillatory activity in response to speech in children from 4 to 6 years old.Developmental science · 2020Article
- Is atypical rhythm a risk factor for developmental speech and language disorders?Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2020Review
- Selective enhancement of low-gamma activity by tACS improves phonemic processing and reading accuracy in dyslexia.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Dyslexia as an adaptation to cortico-limbic stress system reactivity.Neurobiology of stress · 2020Review
- An Evolutionary Perspective of Dyslexia, Stress, and Brain Network Homeostasis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whether phonological deficits in developmental dyslexia are associated with impaired neural sampling of auditory information at either syllabic- or phonemic-rates is still under debate. In addition, whereas neuroanatomical alterations in auditory regions have been documented in dyslexic readers, whether and how these structural anomalies are linked to auditory sampling and reading deficits remains poorly understood. In this study, we measured auditory neural synchronization at different frequencies corresponding to relevant phonological spectral components of speech in children and adults with and without dyslexia, using magnetoencephalography. Furthermore, structural MRI was used to estimate cortical thickness of the auditory cortex of participants. Dyslexics showed atypical brain synchronization at both syllabic (slow) and phonemic (fast) rates. Interestingly, while a left hemispheric asymmetry in cortical thickness was functionally related to a stronger left hemispheric lateralization of neural synchronization to stimuli presented at the phonemic rate in skilled readers, the same anatomical index in dyslexics was related to a stronger right hemispheric dominance for neural synchronization to syllabic-rate auditory stimuli. These data suggest that the acoustic sampling deficit in development dyslexia might be linked to an atypical specialization of the auditory cortex to both low and high frequency amplitude modulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.