Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26356635›Full record

ArticleThyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association2015

Impact of the Multi-Gene ThyroSeq Next-Generation Sequencing Assay on Cancer Diagnosis in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Cytology.

Yuri E Nikiforov, Sally E Carty, Simon I Chiosea, Christopher Coyne, Umamaheswar Duvvuri, Robert L Ferris, William E Gooding, Shane O LeBeau, N Paul Ohori, Raja R Seethala and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02681328 (Randomized Trial Comparing Performance of Molecular Markers for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules), which is not on this map. Cited by 151 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
41.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02681328 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Trial Comparing Performance of Molecular Markers for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

TypeobservationalSponsorJonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2016 to 2027Enrolled328ConditionsThyroidArmsAfirma GEC, ThyroSeq v.2, Afirma GSC, ThyroSeq v.3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 383 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Molecular Variants and Their Risks for Malignancy in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Evolving trends in pediatric thyroid nodules and cancer management.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The actual and future role of molecular tests in thyroid pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuri E Nikiforov1 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sally E Carty2 Division of Endocrine Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Simon I Chiosea1 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Christopher Coyne3 Division of Endocrinology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Umamaheswar Duvvuri4 Department of Otolaryngology, Head Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert L Ferris4 Department of Otolaryngology, Head Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
William E Gooding5 Biostatisctics Facility, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Shane O LeBeau3 Division of Endocrinology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
N Paul Ohori1 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Raja R Seethala1 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Mitchell E Tublin6 Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Linwah Yip2 Division of Endocrine Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Marina N Nikiforova1 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30CA047904NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a common approach to evaluate thyroid nodules. It offers definitive diagnosis of a benign or malignant nodule in the majority of cases. However, 10-25% of nodules yield one of three indeterminate cytologic diagnoses, leading to suboptimal management of these patients. Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undermined significance (AUS/FLUS) is a common indeterminate diagnosis, with the cancer risk ranging from 6% to 48%. This study assessed whether a multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay can offer significant improvement in diagnosis in AUS/FLUS nodules.

methodsFrom May 2014 to March 2015, 465 consecutive FNA samples with the cytologic diagnosis of AUS/FLUS underwent prospective molecular testing using the ThyroSeq v2.1 panel. The panel included 14 genes analyzed for point mutations and 42 types of gene fusions occurring in thyroid cancer. In addition, eight genes were assessed for expression in order to evaluate the cell composition of FNA samples. Ninety-eight (21%) of these nodules had definitive surgical (n = 96) or nonsurgical (n = 2) follow-up and were used to determine the assay performance.

resultsAmong 465 AUS/FLUS nodules, three were found to be composed of parathyroid cells and 462 of thyroid follicular cells. Of the latter, 31 (6.7%) were positive for mutations. The most frequently mutated genes were NRAS and HRAS, and overall point mutations in seven different genes and five types of gene fusions were identified in these nodules. Among 98 nodules with known outcome, histologic analysis revealed 22 (22.5%) cancers. ThyroSeq v2.1 was able to classify 20/22 cancers correctly, showing a sensitivity of 90.9% [confidence interval (CI) 78.8-100], specificity of 92.1% [CI 86.0-98.2], positive predictive value of 76.9% [CI 60.7-93.1], and negative predictive value of 97.2% [CI 78.8-100], with an overall accuracy of 91.8% [CI 86.4-97.3].

conclusionsThe results of the study demonstrate that the ThyroSeq v2.1 multi-gene NGS panel of molecular markers provides both high sensitivity and high specificity for cancer detection in thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology, which should allow improved management for these patients.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingBiopsy, Fine-NeedleHumansMutationProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityThyroid GlandThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid Nodule

Identifiers

PMID26356635
PMCPMC4652198
OpenAlexW2109174925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.