Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26356631›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2015

Protein-polymer conjugation-moving beyond PEGylation.

Yizhi Qi, Ashutosh Chilkoti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Placental drug transport and fetal exposure during pregnancy is determined by drug molecular size, chemistry, and conformation.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Chemical Approaches to Synthetic Drug Delivery Systems for Systemic Applications.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yizhi QiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Ashutosh ChilkotiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA; Center for Biologically Inspired Materials and Materials Systems, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: chilkoti@duke.edu.

Funding

Protease Operated Depot for Delivery of GLP-1R01DK091789 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHILKOTI, ASHUTOSH · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
Site-Specific Growth of Stealth Polymer from Peptide TherapeuticsR01DK092665 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHILKOTI, ASHUTOSH · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK091789NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK091789NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK092665NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK092665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we summarize-from a materials science perspective-the current state of the field of polymer conjugates of peptide and protein drugs, with a focus on polymers that have been developed as alternatives to the current gold standard, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). PEGylation, or the covalent conjugation of PEG to biological therapeutics to improve their therapeutic efficacy by increasing their circulation half-lives and stability, has been the gold standard in the pharmaceutical industry for several decades. After years of research and development, the limitations of PEG, specifically its non-degradability and immunogenicity have become increasingly apparent. While PEG is still currently the best polymer available with the longest clinical track record, extensive research is underway to develop alternative materials in an effort to address these limitations of PEG. Many of these alternative materials have shown promise, though most of them are still in an early stage of development and their in vivo distribution, mechanism of degradation, route of elimination and immunogenicity have not been investigated to a similar extent as for PEG. Thus, further in-depth in vivo testing is essential to validate whether any of the alternative materials discussed in this review qualify as a replacement for PEG.

Indexed as

AnimalsChemistry Techniques, SyntheticHumansPeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersProteinsPeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersProteins

Identifiers

PMID26356631
PMCPMC4624571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.