Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26356560›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2015

The investigation and treatment of female pelvic floor dysfunction.

Katharina Jundt, Ursula Peschers, Heribert Kentenich

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina JundtPrivate practice for gynecology at Pasinger Bahnhof, München, Pelvic Floor Center München, Surgical Hospital München-Bogenhausen, Fertility Center Berlin; DRK Hospital Berlin Westend.
Ursula Peschers
Heribert Kentenich
München Klinik Bogenhausen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background25% of all women report involuntary loss of urine, and 7% may require treatment.

methodsThis review is based on a selection of pertinent literature, including guidelines and Cochrane reviews.

resultsThe assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction in women begins with a basic evaluation that is followed by special diagnostic tests if indicated. The physician taking the clinical history should inquire about the patient's behavior, personality, social and other stressors, and eating and drinking habits, as well as any mental disorders that may be present, including anxiety disorders, depression, somatization disorders, and disorders of adaptation. Conservative treatment consists mainly of lifestyle changes, physiotherapy, and medication. Stress incontinence is most commonly treated with pelvic floor exercises, with a documented success rate of 56.1% vs. 6% without such treatment (relative risk 8.38, 95% confidence interval 3.67-19.07). If incontinence persists, surgery may be indicated ( implantation of suburethral tension-free slings, or colposuspension). Feedback and biofeedback training can be used to treat an overactive bladder. If these techniques and drug therapy are unsuccessful, botulinum toxin injections can be considered.

conclusionWell-validated treatments for pelvic floor dysfunction are available. Psychosomatic factors must be taken into account and can have a major effect on treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyCombined Modality TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineExercise TherapyFemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansPelvic Floor DisordersSuburethral SlingsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID26356560
PMCPMC4570968
OpenAlexW2411887444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.