Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26356174›Full record

ReviewTransplantation2016

Epigenetics in Kidney Transplantation: Current Evidence, Predictions, and Future Research Directions.

Valeria R Mas, Thu H Le, Daniel G Maluf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mitophagy in kidney transplantation ischemia-reperfusion injury.International urology and nephrology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valeria R Mas1 Translational Genomics Transplant Laboratory, Division of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. 2 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. 3 Transplant Surgery, Division of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Thu H Le
Daniel G Maluf
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Molecular pathways leading to chronic graft dysfunctionR01DK080074 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MAS, VALERIA RAQUEL · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
Molecular biomarkers associated with calcineurin inhibitor mediated kidney injuryR21DK100678 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MALUF, DANIEL GERMAN · 2014 to 2015
$435k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK080074NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK080074NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK100678NIDDK NIH HHS R21DK100678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications are changes to the genome that occur without any alteration in DNA sequence. These changes include cytosine methylation of DNA at cytosine-phosphate diester-guanine dinucleotides, histone modifications, microRNA interactions, and chromatin remodeling complexes. Epigenetic modifications may exert their effect independently or complementary to genetic variants and have the potential to modify gene expression. These modifications are dynamic, potentially heritable, and can be induced by environmental stimuli or drugs. There is emerging evidence that epigenetics play an important role in health and disease. However, the impact of epigenetic modifications on the outcomes of kidney transplantation is currently poorly understood and deserves further exploration. Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for end-stage renal disease, but allograft loss remains a significant challenge that leads to increased morbidity and return to dialysis. Epigenetic modifications may influence the activation, proliferation, and differentiation of the immune cells, and therefore may have a critical role in the host immune response to the allograft and its outcome. The epigenome of the donor may also impact kidney graft survival, especially those epigenetic modifications associated with early transplant stressors (e.g., cold ischemia time) and donor aging. In the present review, we discuss evidence supporting the role of epigenetic modifications in ischemia-reperfusion injury, host immune response to the graft, and graft response to injury as potential new tools for the diagnosis and prediction of graft function, and new therapeutic targets for improving outcomes of kidney transplantation.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticKidneyKidney TransplantationAllograftsAnimalsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA MethylationFibrosisGene Expression RegulationGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHistone DeacetylasesHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMicroRNAsHistone DeacetylasesMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID26356174
PMCPMC6843994
OpenAlexW2327221906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.