ArticlePloS one2015
Scale-Adjusted Metrics for Predicting the Evolution of Urban Indicators and Quantifying the Performance of Cities.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving spatiotemporal patterns and urban scaling of deaths from external causes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Commuting network effect on urban wealth scaling.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Estimating the drivers of urban economic complexity and their connection to economic performance.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- COVID-19 policy analysis: labour structure dictates lockdown mobility behaviour.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Scaling behavior of public procurement activity.PloS one · 2021Article
- Rural-urban scaling of age, mortality, crime and property reveals a loss of expected self-similar behaviour.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Socio-economic urban scaling properties: Influence of regional geographic heterogeneities in Brazil.PloS one · 2020Article
- Scaling in words on Twitter.Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- Reconstructing commuters network using machine learning and urban indicators.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A worldwide model for boundaries of urban settlements.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Universal scaling laws in metro area election results.PloS one · 2018Article
- Unveiling relationships between crime and property in England and Wales via density scale-adjusted metrics and network tools.PloS one · 2018Article
- Human mobility in large cities as a proxy for crime.PloS one · 2017Article
- Rural to Urban Population Density Scaling of Crime and Property Transactions in English and Welsh Parliamentary Constituencies.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than a half of world population is now living in cities and this number is expected to be two-thirds by 2050. Fostered by the relevancy of a scientific characterization of cities and for the availability of an unprecedented amount of data, academics have recently immersed in this topic and one of the most striking and universal finding was the discovery of robust allometric scaling laws between several urban indicators and the population size. Despite that, most governmental reports and several academic works still ignore these nonlinearities by often analyzing the raw or the per capita value of urban indicators, a practice that actually makes the urban metrics biased towards small or large cities depending on whether we have super or sublinear allometries. By following the ideas of Bettencourt et al. [PLoS ONE 5 (2010) e13541], we account for this bias by evaluating the difference between the actual value of an urban indicator and the value expected by the allometry with the population size. We show that this scale-adjusted metric provides a more appropriate/informative summary of the evolution of urban indicators and reveals patterns that do not appear in the evolution of per capita values of indicators obtained from Brazilian cities. We also show that these scale-adjusted metrics are strongly correlated with their past values by a linear correspondence and that they also display crosscorrelations among themselves. Simple linear models account for 31%-97% of the observed variance in data and correctly reproduce the average of the scale-adjusted metric when grouping the cities in above and below the allometric laws. We further employ these models to forecast future values of urban indicators and, by visualizing the predicted changes, we verify the emergence of spatial clusters characterized by regions of the Brazilian territory where we expect an increase or a decrease in the values of urban indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.