Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26355756›Full record

ArticleDiabetes technology & therapeutics2015

Standardized Glycemic Management with a Computerized Workflow and Decision Support System for Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Different Wards.

Katharina M Neubauer, Julia K Mader, Bernhard Höll, Felix Aberer, Klaus Donsa, Thomas Augustin, Lukas Schaupp, Stephan Spat, Peter Beck, Friedrich M Fruhwald and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07664293 (Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital Electronic Glucose Management System), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07664293 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital Electronic Glucose Management System (eGMS) With Conventional Subcutaneous Basal-Bolus Insulin Protocol in Ordinary Ward Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFar Eastern Memorial HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled140ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsFEMH Electronic Glucose Management System (FEMH-eGMS), Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Hospital diabetes management (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Artificial Intelligence in Diabetes Care: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities Ahead.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Review
  10. Inpatient Insulin Dosing Calculators.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Hospital diabetes management (Update 2023)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Inpatient Hypoglycemia: The Challenge Remains.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Katharina M Neubauer1 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
Julia K Mader1 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
Bernhard Höll2 Joanneum Research GmbH, HEALTH, Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences , Graz, Austria .
Felix Aberer1 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
Klaus Donsa2 Joanneum Research GmbH, HEALTH, Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences , Graz, Austria .
Thomas Augustin2 Joanneum Research GmbH, HEALTH, Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences , Graz, Austria .
Lukas Schaupp1 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
Stephan Spat2 Joanneum Research GmbH, HEALTH, Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences , Graz, Austria .
Peter Beck2 Joanneum Research GmbH, HEALTH, Institute for Biomedicine and Health Sciences , Graz, Austria .
Friedrich M Fruhwald3 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
Christian Schnedl4 Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
Alexander R Rosenkranz4 Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
David B Lumenta5 Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
Lars-Peter Kamolz5 Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
Johannes Plank1 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .
Thomas R Pieber1 Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated the efficacy, safety, and usability of standardized glycemic management by a computerized decision support system for non-critically ill hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes on four different wards. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this open, noncontrolled intervention study, glycemic management of 99 patients with type 2 diabetes (62% acute admissions; 41 females; age, 67±11 years; hemoglobin A1c, 65±21 mmol/mol; body mass index, 30.4±6.5 kg/m(2)) on clinical wards (Cardiology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, Plastic Surgery) of a tertiary-care hospital was guided by GlucoTab(®) (Joanneum Research GmbH [Graz, Austria] and Medical University of Graz [Graz, Austria]), a mobile decision support system providing automated workflow support and suggestions for insulin dosing to nurses and physicians.

resultsAdherence to insulin dosing suggestions was high (96.5% bolus, 96.7% basal). The primary outcome measure, percentage of blood glucose (BG) measurements in the range of 70-140 mg/dL, occurred in 50.2±22.2% of all measurements. The overall mean BG level was 154±35 mg/dL. BG measurements in the ranges of 60-70 mg/dL, 40-60 mg/dL, and <40 mg/dL occurred in 1.4%, 0.5%, and 0.0% of all measurements, respectively. A regression analysis showed that acute admission to the Cardiology Ward (+30 mg/dL) and preexisting home insulin therapy (+26 mg/dL) had the strongest impact on mean BG. Acute admission to other wards had minor effects (+4 mg/dL). Ninety-one percent of the healthcare professionals felt confident with GlucoTab, and 89% believed in its practicality and 80% in its ability to prevent medication errors.

conclusionsAn efficacious, safe, and user-accepted implementation of GlucoTab was demonstrated. However, for optimized personalized patient care, further algorithm modifications are required.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalAgedAlgorithmsAustriaBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Administration ScheduleFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInpatientsInsulinMaleMiddle AgedSoftwareBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID26355756
PMCPMC4575539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.