Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26355682›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2015

Bayesian inference for duplication-mutation with complementarity network models.

Ajay Jasra, Adam Persing, Alexandros Beskos, Kari Heine, Maria De Iorio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ajay Jasra1 Department of Statistics & Applied Probability, National University of Singapore , Singapore, Singapore .
Adam Persing2 Department of Statistical Science, University College London , London, United Kingdom .
Alexandros Beskos2 Department of Statistical Science, University College London , London, United Kingdom .
Kari Heine2 Department of Statistical Science, University College London , London, United Kingdom .
Maria De Iorio2 Department of Statistical Science, University College London , London, United Kingdom .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We observe an undirected graph G without multiple edges and self-loops, which is to represent a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. We assume that G evolved under the duplication-mutation with complementarity (DMC) model from a seed graph, G0, and we also observe the binary forest Γ that represents the duplication history of G. A posterior density for the DMC model parameters is established, and we outline a sampling strategy by which one can perform Bayesian inference; that sampling strategy employs a particle marginal Metropolis-Hastings (PMMH) algorithm. We test our methodology on numerical examples to demonstrate a high accuracy and precision in the inference of the DMC model's mutation and homodimerization parameters.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationAlgorithmsBayes TheoremMarkov ChainsModels, GeneticMonte Carlo MethodProtein Interaction Mapsduplication–mutation with complementarity (DMC) modelparticle marginal Metropolis–Hastings (PMMH)protein–protein interaction (PPI) networksequential Monte Carlo (SMC)

Identifiers

PMID26355682
PMCPMC4642832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.