Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26355676›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Neural Model of Auditory Space Compatible with Human Perception under Simulated Echoic Conditions.

Brian S Nelson, Jeff M Donovan, Terry T Takahashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brian S NelsonInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Jeff M DonovanInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Terry T TakahashiInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.

Funding

MASKING IN THE AUDITORY SYSTEMR01DC003925 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI TAKAHASHI, TERRY T · 1999 to 2012
$4.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003925NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC003925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a typical auditory scene, sounds from different sources and reflective surfaces summate in the ears, causing spatial cues to fluctuate. Prevailing hypotheses of how spatial locations may be encoded and represented across auditory neurons generally disregard these fluctuations and must therefore invoke additional mechanisms for detecting and representing them. Here, we consider a different hypothesis in which spatial perception corresponds to an intermediate or sub-maximal firing probability across spatially selective neurons within each hemisphere. The precedence or Haas effect presents an ideal opportunity for examining this hypothesis, since the temporal superposition of an acoustical reflection with sounds arriving directly from a source can cause otherwise stable cues to fluctuate. Our findings suggest that subjects' experiences may simply reflect the spatial cues that momentarily arise under various acoustical conditions and how these cues are represented. We further suggest that auditory objects may acquire "edges" under conditions when interaural time differences are broadly distributed.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionModels, NeurologicalModels, PsychologicalSpace PerceptionAlgorithmsComputer SimulationCuesHumansSound Localization

Identifiers

PMID26355676
PMCPMC4565656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.