Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26355573›Full record

SynthesisAIDS (London, England)2015

Growth reconstitution following antiretroviral therapy and nutritional supplementation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Christine J McGrath, Lara Diener, Barbra A Richardson, Elizabeth Peacock-Chambers, Grace C John-Stewart

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AIDS (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine J McGrathaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas bDepartment of Global Health cDepartment of Biostatistics dDivision of Vaccine and Infectious Diseases, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington eDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts fDepartment of Medicine gDepartment of Pediatrics hDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Lara Diener
Barbra A Richardson
Elizabeth Peacock-Chambers
Grace C John-Stewart

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EDWIN ROBERTO ORELLANA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
VENEREAL DISEASET32AI007140 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Julia Cook Dombrowski · 1985 to 2026
$19.4M
UTMB WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH SCHOLARS PROGRAMK12HD052023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI BERENSON, ABBEY B · 2005 to 2023
$8.1M
Pediatric HIV-1 in Africa: Pathogenesis and ManagementK24HD054314 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN-STEWART, GRACE C. · 2006 to 2016
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007140NIAID NIH HHS T32AI007140NICHD NIH HHS HD054314NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052023NICHD NIH HHS K12HD052023NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD054314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs antiretroviral therapy (ART) expands for HIV-infected children, it is important to determine its impact on growth. We quantified growth and its determinants following ART in resource-limited (RLS) and developed settings.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsWe searched publications reporting growth [weight-for-age (WAZ), height-for-age (HAZ), and weight-for-height (WHZ) z scores] in HIV-infected children following ART through August 2014. Inclusion criteria were as follows: younger than 18 years; ART; at least 20 patients; growth at ART; and post-ART growth. Standardized and overall weighted mean differences were calculated using random-effects models.

resultsA total of 67 articles were eligible (RLS = 54; developed settings = 13). Mean age was 5.8 years, and comparable between settings (P = 0.90). Baseline growth was substantially lower in RLS vs. developed settings (WAZ -2.1 vs. -0.5; HAZ -2.2 vs. -0.9; both P < 0.01). Rate of weight but not height reconstitution during 12 and 24 months was higher in RLS (12-month WAZ change 0.84 vs. 0.17, P < 0.01). Growth deficits persisted in RLS after 2 years ART (P = 0.04). Younger cohort age was associated with greater growth reconstitution. Protease inhibitor and nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor regimens yielded comparable growth. Adjusting for age and setting, cohorts with nutritional supplements had greater growth gains (24-month rate difference: WAZ 0.55, P = 0.03; HAZ 0.60, P = 0.007). Supplement benefits were attenuated after adjusting for baseline cohort growth.

conclusionRLS children had substantial growth deficits compared with developed settings counterparts at ART; growth shortfalls in RLS persisted despite reconstitution. Earlier age and nutritional supplementation at ART may improve growth outcomes. Scant data on supplementation limit evaluation of impact and underscores need for systematic data collection regarding supplementation in pediatric ART programmes/cohorts.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDietary SupplementsAdolescentAnthropologyAnti-Retroviral AgentsBiostatisticsChildChild, PreschoolDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID26355573
PMCPMC4579534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.