Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26354828›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2015

Fast nastic motion of plants and bioinspired structures.

Q Guo, E Dai, X Han, S Xie, E Chao, Z Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Extensile Active Hydrogels Driven by Living FtsZ Polymers.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Reversible Snapping of Constrained Anisotropic Hydrogels Upon Light Stimulations.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  5. Intrinsically Multistable Soft Actuator Driven by Mixed-Mode Snap-Through Instabilities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. From a Pinecone to Design of an Active Textile.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Snapping mechanics of the Venus flytrap (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Q GuoCollege of Materials Science and Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350108, China Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials Processing and Application, Fuzhou 350108, China.
E DaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA.
X HanThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
S XieDepartment of Energy, Environmental, and Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA.
E ChaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Z ChenThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA zi.chen@dartmouth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-0249
Washington University in St. Louis · USDartmouth College · USFujian University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capability to sense and respond to external mechanical stimuli at various timescales is essential to many physiological aspects in plants, including self-protection, intake of nutrients and reproduction. Remarkably, some plants have evolved the ability to react to mechanical stimuli within a few seconds despite a lack of muscles and nerves. The fast movements of plants in response to mechanical stimuli have long captured the curiosity of scientists and engineers, but the mechanisms behind these rapid thigmonastic movements are still not understood completely. In this article, we provide an overview of such thigmonastic movements in several representative plants, including Dionaea, Utricularia, Aldrovanda, Drosera and Mimosa. In addition, we review a series of studies that present biomimetic structures inspired by fast-moving plants. We hope that this article will shed light on the current status of research on the fast movements of plants and bioinspired structures and also promote interdisciplinary studies on both the fundamental mechanisms of plants' fast movements and biomimetic structures for engineering applications, such as artificial muscles, multi-stable structures and bioinspired robots.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlant Physiological PhenomenaPlantsbiomechanicscarnivorous plantsevolutionfast movementmechanical buckling instabilitynastic movement

Identifiers

PMID26354828
PMCPMC4614472
OpenAlexW2135807906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.