Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26354791›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2016

Continuous co-production of ethanol and xylitol from rice straw hydrolysate in a membrane bioreactor.

Omid Zahed, Gholamreza Salehi Jouzani, Saeed Abbasalizadeh, Faramarz Khodaiyan, Meisam Tabatabaei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omid ZahedMicrobial Biotechnology and Biosafety Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), SPII Campus, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, P.O. Box: 31535-1897, Iran.
Gholamreza Salehi JouzaniMicrobial Biotechnology and Biosafety Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), SPII Campus, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, P.O. Box: 31535-1897, Iran. gsalehi@abrii.ac.ir.
Saeed AbbasalizadehMicrobial Biotechnology and Biosafety Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), SPII Campus, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, P.O. Box: 31535-1897, Iran.
Faramarz KhodaiyanDepartment of Food Science, Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
Meisam TabatabaeiMicrobial Biotechnology and Biosafety Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), SPII Campus, Mahdasht Road, Karaj, P.O. Box: 31535-1897, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was set to develop a robust and economic biorefinery process for continuous co-production of ethanol and xylitol from rice straw in a membrane bioreactor. Acid pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, detoxification, yeast strains selection, single and co-culture batch fermentation, and finally continuous co-fermentation were optimized. The combination of diluted acid pretreatment (3.5 %) and enzymatic conversion (1:10 enzyme (63 floating-point unit (FPU)/mL)/biomass ratio) resulted in the maximum sugar yield (81 % conversion). By concentrating the hydrolysates, sugars level increased by threefold while that of furfural reduced by 50 % (0.56 to 0.28 g/L). Combined application of active carbon and resin led to complete removal of furfural, hydroxyl methyl furfural, and acetic acid. The strains Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCIM 3090 with 66.4 g/L ethanol production and Candida tropicalis NCIM 3119 with 9.9 g/L xylitol production were selected. The maximum concentrations of ethanol and xylitol in the single cultures were recorded at 31.5 g/L (0.42 g/g yield) and 26.5 g/L (0.58 g/g yield), respectively. In the batch co-culture system, the ethanol and xylitol productions were 33.4 g/L (0.44 g/g yield) and 25.1 g/L (0.55 g/g yield), respectively. The maximum ethanol and xylitol volumetric productivity values in the batch co-culture system were 65 and 58 % after 25 and 60 h, but were improved in the continuous co-culture mode and reached 80 % (55 g/L) and 68 % (31 g/L) at the dilution rate of 0.03 L per hour, respectively. Hence, the continuous co-production strategy developed in this study could be recommended for producing value-added products from this hugely generated lignocellulosic waste.

Indexed as

BioreactorsFermentationBiomassBiotransformationCelluloseEthanolHydrolysisKineticsNitrogenOryzaOxygenSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSulfuric AcidsXylitolCelluloseEthanolNitrogenOxygensulfuric acidSulfuric AcidsXylitol

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.