Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26354340›Full record

ArticleBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2015

How rods respond to single photons: Key adaptations of a G-protein cascade that enable vision at the physical limit of perception.

Jürgen Reingruber, David Holcman, Gordon L Fain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Structural basis of calmodulin modulation of the rod cyclic nucleotide-gated channel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Solo vs. Chorus: Monomers and Oligomers of Arrestin Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Reproducibility of the Rod Photoreceptor Response Depends Critically on the Concentration of the Phosphodiesterase Effector Enzyme.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The evolution of rod photoreceptors.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jürgen ReingruberIBENS, Group of Computational Biology and Applied Mathematics, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
David HolcmanIBENS, Group of Computational Biology and Applied Mathematics, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
Gordon L FainDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Terasaki Life Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Vision Research Core at UCLAP30EY000331 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Xian-Jie Yang · 1985 to 2026
$16.8M
PHYSIOLOGY OF PHOTORECEPTORSR01EY001844 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GORDON Lee FAIN · 1985 to 2026
$9.9M
PHYSIOLOGY OF PHOTORECEPTORSR37EY001844 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FAIN, GORDON LEE · 1990 to 1999
–
NEI NIH HHS EY 01844NEI NIH HHS P30 EY000331NEI NIH HHS R01 EY001844NEI NIH HHS R37 EY001844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rod photoreceptors are among the most sensitive light detectors in nature. They achieve their remarkable sensitivity across a wide variety of species through a number of essential adaptations: a specialized cellular geometry, a G-protein cascade with an unusually stable receptor molecule, a low-noise transduction mechanism, a nearly perfect effector enzyme, and highly evolved mechanisms of feedback control and receptor deactivation. Practically any change in protein expression, enzyme activity, or feedback control can be shown to impair photon detection, either by decreasing sensitivity or signal-to-noise ratio, or by reducing temporal resolution. Comparison of mammals to amphibians suggests that rod outer-segment morphology and the molecules and mechanism of transduction may have evolved together to optimize light sensitivity in darkness, which culminates in the extraordinary ability of these cells to respond to single photons at the ultimate limit of visual perception.

Indexed as

PhotonsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBufo marinusCyclic GMPLightMammalsMiceRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsRhodopsinSignal TransductionVision, OcularVisual PerceptionCyclic GMPRhodopsinG-protein receptorphosphodiesterasephotoreceptorsretinarhodopsinrodsvision

Identifiers

PMID26354340
PMCPMC4629483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.