ReviewMaterials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications2015
When 1+1>2: Nanostructured composites for hard tissue engineering applications.
Review in Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The micro CT evaluation of crown and root pulp volume versus dentin thickness in teeth in postmortem interval (PMI).Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
- Hybrid Hydroxyapatite-Metal Complex Materials Derived from Amino Acids and Nucleobases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Nanomaterials Regulate Bacterial Quorum Sensing: Applications, Mechanisms, and Optimization Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Supplementation of Polymeric Reservoirs with Redox-Responsive Metallic Nanoparticles as a New Concept for the Smart Delivery of Insulin in Diabetes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- When Nothing Turns Itself Inside out and Becomes Something: Coating Poly(Lactic-Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- Advanced materials for enamel remineralization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Applications of Polymeric Composites in Bone Tissue Engineering and Jawbone Regeneration.Polymers · 2021Review
- Critical Review of Biodegradable and Bioactive Polymer Composites for Bone Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery Applications.Polymers · 2021Review
- Improved Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion Using a Biomimetic, Nanocomposite Scaffold Augmented by Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Chitosan-Based Biomimetically Mineralized Composite Materials in Human Hard Tissue Repair.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The Significance and Utilisation of Biomimetic and Bioinspired Strategies in the Field of Biomedical Material Engineering: The Case of Calcium Phosphat-Protein Template Constructs.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Waiting for Aπαταω: 250 Years Later.Foundations of science · 2019Article
- Antimicrobial and Osseointegration Properties of Nanostructured Titanium Orthopaedic Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Antimicrobial Hydroxyapatite-Gelatin-Silica Composite Pastes with Tunable Setting Properties.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2017Article
- Enhancing regenerative approaches with nanoparticles.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Review
- Carriers for the tunable release of therapeutics: etymological classification and examples.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2016Review
- Chitosan-PLGA polymer blends as coatings for hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and their effect on antimicrobial properties, osteoconductivity and regeneration of osseous tissues.Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Multicomponent, synergistic and multifunctional nanostructures have taken over the spotlight in the realm of biomedical nanotechnologies. The most prospective materials for bone regeneration today are almost exclusively composites comprising two or more components that compensate for the shortcomings of each one of them alone. This is quite natural in view of the fact that all hard tissues in the human body, except perhaps the tooth enamel, are composite nanostructures. This review article highlights some of the most prospective breakthroughs made in this research direction, with the hard tissues in main focus being those comprising bone, tooth cementum, dentin and enamel. The major obstacles to creating collagen/apatite composites modeled after the structure of bone are mentioned, including the immunogenicity of xenogeneic collagen and continuously failing attempts to replicate the biomineralization process in vitro. Composites comprising a polymeric component and calcium phosphate are discussed in light of their ability to emulate the soft/hard composite structure of bone. Hard tissue engineering composites created using hard material components other than calcium phosphates, including silica, metals and several types of nanotubes, are also discoursed on, alongside additional components deliverable using these materials, such as cells, growth factors, peptides, antibiotics, antiresorptive and anabolic agents, pharmacokinetic conjugates and various cell-specific targeting moieties. It is concluded that a variety of hard tissue structures in the body necessitates a similar variety of biomaterials for their regeneration. The ongoing development of nanocomposites for bone restoration will result in smart, theranostic materials, capable of acting therapeutically in direct feedback with the outcome of in situ disease monitoring at the cellular and subcellular scales. Progress in this research direction is expected to take us to the next generation of biomaterials, designed with the purpose of fulfilling Daedalus' dream - not restoring the tissues, but rather augmenting them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.