Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26354213›Full record

Trial reportThe Indian journal of medical research2015

Efficacy of stem cell in improvement of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction--MI3 Trial.

Velu Nair, Hemant Madan, Sunil Sofat, Prosenjit Ganguli, M J Jacob, Rajat Datta, Prashant Bharadwaj, R S Sarkar, A J Pandit, Soniya Nityanand and 21 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Indian journal of medical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Therapeutic Use of Stem Cells for Myocardial Infarction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Authors' response.The Indian journal of medical research · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Velu NairArmy Hospital (Research and Referral), New Delhi, India.
Hemant Madan
Sunil Sofat
Prosenjit Ganguli
M J Jacob
Rajat Datta
Prashant Bharadwaj
R S Sarkar
A J Pandit
Soniya Nityanand
Pravin K Goel
Naveen Garg
Sanjay Gambhir
Paul V George
Sunil Chandy
Vikram Mathews
Oomen K George
K K Talwar
Ajay Bahl
Neelam Marwah
Anish Bhatacharya
Balram Bhargava
Balram Airan
Sujata Mohanty
Chetan D Patel
Alka Sharma
Shinjini Bhatnagar
A Mondal
Jacob Jose
A Srivastava
MI3 Trial
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INArmy Hospital Research and Referral · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INDepartment of Biotechnology · INInstitute of Nuclear Medicine & Allied Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectivesAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) is characterized by irreparable and irreversible loss of cardiac myocytes. Despite major advances in the management of AMI, a large number of patients are left with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), which is a major determinant of short and long term morbidity and mortality. A review of 33 randomized control trials has shown varying improvement in left ventricular (LV) function in patients receiving stem cells compared to standard medical therapy. Most trials had small sample size and were underpowered. This phase III prospective, open labelled, randomized multicenteric trial was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy in improving the LVEF over a period of six months, after injecting a predefined dose of 5-10 × 10 [8] autologous mononuclear cells (MNC) by intra-coronary route, in patients, one to three weeks post ST elevation AMI, in addition to the standard medical therapy.

methodsIn this phase III prospective, multicentric trial 250 patients with AMI were included and randomized into stem cell therapy (SCT) and non SCT groups. All patients were followed up for six months. Patients with AMI having left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20-50 per cent were included and were randomized to receive intracoronary stem cell infusion after successfully completing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

resultsOn intention-to-treat analysis the infusion of MNCs had no positive impact on LVEF improvement of ≥ 5 per cent. The improvement in LVEF after six months was 5.17 ± 8.90 per cent in non SCT group and 4.82 ± 10.32 per cent in SCT group. The adverse effects were comparable in both the groups. On post hoc analysis it was noted that the cell dose had a positive impact when infused in the dose of ≥ 5 X 10 [8] (n=71). This benefit was noted upto three weeks post AMI. There were 38 trial deviates in the SCT group which was a limitation of the study. INTERPRETATION &

conclusionsInfusion of stem cells was found to have no benefit in ST elevation AMI. However, the procedure was safe. A possible benefit was seen when the predefined cell dose was administered which was noted upto three weeks post AMI, but this was not significant and needs confirmation by larger trials.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAgedBone MarrowEchocardiographyFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionStem CellsTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, Left

Identifiers

PMID26354213
PMCPMC4613437
OpenAlexW1783135197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.