Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26353881›Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2015

Disability Discrimination and Obesity: The Big Questions?

Stuart W Flint, Jeremé Snook

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. 360-Degree Perspectives on Obesity.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. We Take Care of Person with Obesity, Not Obesity That People Has.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stuart W FlintAcademy of Sport and Physical Activity, Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. s.flint@shu.ac.uk.
Jeremé SnookThe Department of Law, Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. j.snook@shu.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity discrimination in employment and recruitment has become a topic of focus for research examination with increasing reports of discrimination by colleagues and managers. Whilst a limited number of legal cases have emerged, disability law is consulted in line with the expectation of anti-discriminatory practices at work. In line with disability law, whether obesity is defined as a disability or not has an impact on the outcome of a court ruling. Ambiguity when defining obesity through either the medical or social model means there are many questions that remain unanswered which might lead to inconsistency in court rulings.

Indexed as

EmploymentPrejudiceAdultHumansObesityPersons with DisabilitiesSocial DiscriminationSocial EnvironmentWork Capacity EvaluationWorkplaceDiscriminationEmployment lawObesityStigmaWeight biasWorkplace

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.