Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26353787›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2015

A randomized trial of a minimal intervention for sexual concerns after cancer: a comparison of self-help and professionally delivered modalities.

Janette Perz, Jane M Ussher, Australian Cancer and Sexuality Study Team

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04297657 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

The effect of better model counselling with model over sexual problems of women with breast cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2016 to 2018Enrolled60ConditionsSexuality, Breast CancerArmsCounselling
NCT07517549 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect Of Sexual Counseling Based On the Extended Plissit Model On Sexual Function, Marital Adjustment, Sexual Quality Of Life, Depression, Anxiety, And Stress During Pregnancy And Postpartum

TypeinterventionalSponsorOrdu UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsSexuality, Depression, Pregnancy RelatedArmssexuality health education group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Feasibility and effectiveness of communication tools for addressing intimacy and sexuality in patients with cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Association between dyadic interventions and outcomes in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Sexual quality of life after gynaecological cancer: what young women want.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Sexual quality of life in young gynaecological cancer survivors: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of the Better Model Based Counseling on Sexuality of Women with Breast Cancer.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sexual Health as Part of Gynecologic Cancer Care: What Do Patients Want?International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Adapting a couple-based intimacy enhancement intervention to breast cancer: A developmental study.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janette PerzCentre for Health Research - School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, 2751, Australia. j.perz@westernsydney.edu.au.
Jane M UssherCentre for Health Research - School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, 2751, Australia. j.ussher@westernsydney.edu.au.
Australian Cancer and Sexuality Study Team
Western Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation and discussion of sexual changes with a health professional is a high priority for many cancer patients in order to assist with sexual changes and ensure that sexual intimacy does not cease post-cancer. The PLISSIT model is widely recommended as a framework for providing sexual information and support, allowing for the discussion of sexual changes at various levels of increasing intensity. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the early stages of the PLISSIT model by examining the relative efficacy of written information provision about cancer related sexual changes, and information provision accompanied by a single session of counselling, for people with cancer and their partners, across a range of cancer types.

methodEighty-eight people with cancer and 53 partners across a range of sexual and non-sexual cancers, took part in a randomised trial which adopted mixed method analysis to examine changes in psychological wellbeing, quality of life, relationship satisfaction and communication, and sexual functioning, following written information provision about cancer related sexual changes (self-help condition; SH), or written information accompanied by a single session of counselling (health professional condition; HP).

resultsRatings of the usefulness and efficacy of the SH and HP interventions, collected through analysis of Likert scales, open ended survey items and interviews, indicated that both conditions were found to be useful and efficacious by the majority of participants, serving to increase awareness of sexuality, improve couple communication about sex, and help in the management of sexual changes, through the exploration of non-coital sexual practices. In contrast, the quantitative analysis of standardized instruments found no significant improvements in psychological wellbeing, quality of life, relationship satisfaction and communication, or sexual functioning. There were significant reductions in self-silencing in the HP condition, and a trend towards increases in sexual satisfaction across both conditions.

conclusionThese results offer support for the early stages of the PLISSIT model, in terms of normalization and increased awareness of sexual changes after cancer, increased couple communication about sexual changes, and legitimation of exploration of a range of non-coital sexual practices and intimacy. However, more complex and intensive interventions are needed to address sexual functioning and psychological wellbeing. The findings provide support for the proposition that providing permission to discuss sexuality should be the core feature underpinning all stages of interventions designed to provide sexuality information and support for people with cancer and their partners, and also demonstrate the potential importance of limited information and specific suggestions.

trial registrationThis study was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. ( ACTRN12615000399594 ) on 29 April 2015.

Indexed as

PamphletsAdultAgedCommunicationDirective CounselingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQuality of LifeRandom AllocationSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID26353787
PMCPMC4564976
OpenAlexW1892694167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.