Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26353784›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychology2015

A study protocol for Truce: a pragmatic controlled trial of a seven-week acceptance and commitment therapy program for young people who have a parent with cancer.

Pandora Patterson, Fiona E J McDonald, Joseph Ciarrochi, Louise Hayes, Danielle Tracey, Claire E Wakefield, Kate White

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Psycho-oncology.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pandora PattersonResearch, Evaluation and Social Policy, CanTeen, Sydney, Australia. pandora.patterson@canteen.org.au.
Fiona E J McDonaldResearch, Evaluation and Social Policy, CanTeen, Sydney, Australia. fiona.mcdonald@canteen.org.au.
Joseph CiarrochiInstitute of Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia. Joseph.ciarrochi@acu.edu.au.
Louise HayesOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. louiseh@unimelb.edu.au.
Danielle TraceySchool of Education, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia. d.tracey@uws.edu.au.
Claire E WakefieldSchool of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. c.wakefield@unsw.edu.au.
Kate WhiteCancer Nursing Research Unit, Faculty Nursing, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Kate.white@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper presents the rationale and study protocol for a pragmatic controlled effectiveness trial of Truce, a prevention-based selective intervention targeting the significant mental health needs of young people who have a parent with cancer. METHODS/

designTruce is a seven week, facilitated, face-to-face group program. The design is a 2 groups (intervention vs control) x 3 (pre-treatment vs post-treatment vs 2 month follow-up) repeated measures. Allocation to groups will be dependent upon recruitment; when groups have sufficient numbers, they will be assigned to the intervention condition, but participants recruited without a viable group will be assigned to the wait-list control condition. Eligible participants are young people aged 14 to 22 years who have a parent diagnosed with cancer within the last 5 years. Wait-list controls are offered the opportunity to participate in the program once they have completed their follow-up questionnaires. The target sample size is 65 participants in each condition. The primary hypothesis is that participants in the intervention will show significant reductions in distress and increases in psychological well-being relative to participants in the wait-list control group, and these effects will continue through two-month follow-up. Mixed-models analysis of variance will be used to measure differences between the two conditions. Secondary analyses will focus on variables which may relate to the effectiveness of the intervention: ACT-related concepts of experiential avoidance and mindfulness, family functioning, unmet needs and demographic variables. We will also assess program fidelity and satisfaction. DISCUSSION: The development and evaluation of a manualised intervention for young people with a parent with cancer responds to a gap in the provision of empirically-based psychological support for this vulnerable group.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000761561. Registered 22(nd) July 2015.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsParentsAcceptance and Commitment TherapyAdolescentAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthNew ZealandResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26353784
PMCPMC4564955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.