Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26352594›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Response Properties of a Newly Identified Tristratified Narrow Field Amacrine Cell in the Mouse Retina.

G S Newkirk, M Hoon, R O Wong, P B Detwiler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G S NewkirkDepartment of Physiology & Biophysics and Program in Neurobiology & Behavior, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
M HoonDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
R O WongDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
P B DetwilerDepartment of Physiology & Biophysics and Program in Neurobiology & Behavior, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
University of Washington · US

Funding

INTERCELLULAR COMMUNICATION IN RETINAL DEVELOPMENTR01EY010699 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, RACHEL O · 1994 to 2024
$8.6M
RETINAL PHOTORECEPTORS &SECOND ORDER CELLSR01EY002048 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DETWILER, PETER BENTON · 1985 to 2011
$2.7M
NEI NIH HHS EY02048NEI NIH HHS EY10699NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002048NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amacrine cells were targeted for whole cell recording using two-photon fluorescence microscopy in a transgenic mouse line in which the promoter for dopamine receptor 2 drove expression of green fluorescent protein in a narrow field tristratified amacrine cell (TNAC) that had not been studied previously. Light evoked a multiphasic response that was the sum of hyperpolarizing and depolarization synaptic inputs consistent with distinct dendritic ramifications in the off and on sublamina of the inner plexiform layer. The amplitude and waveform of the response, which consisted of an initial brief hyperpolarization at light onset followed by recovery to a plateau potential close to dark resting potential and a hyperpolarizing response at the light offset varied little over an intensity range from 0.4 to ~10^6 Rh*/rod/s. This suggests that the cell functions as a differentiator that generates an output signal (a transient reduction in inhibitory input to downstream retina neurons) that is proportional to the derivative of light input independent of its intensity. The underlying circuitry appears to consist of rod and cone driven on and off bipolar cells that provide direct excitatory input to the cell as well as to GABAergic amacrine cells that are synaptically coupled to TNAC. Canonical reagents that blocked excitatory (glutamatergic) and inhibitory (GABA and glycine) synaptic transmission had effects on responses to scotopic stimuli consistent with the rod driven component of the proposed circuit. However, responses evoked by photopic stimuli were paradoxical and could not be interpreted on the basis of conventional thinking about the neuropharmacology of synaptic interactions in the retina.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAnimalsGABAergic Neuronsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlycineLightMiceMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonReceptors, DopamineRetinaRod-Cone InteractionSynaptic Transmissiongamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlycineReceptors, Dopamine

Identifiers

PMID26352594
PMCPMC4564219
OpenAlexW2142939114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.