Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26352462›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2015

Optimization of tissue physical parameters for accurate temperature estimation from finite-element simulation of radiofrequency ablation.

Swetha Subramanian, T Douglas Mast

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swetha SubramanianDepartment of Biomedical, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA.
T Douglas MastDepartment of Biomedical, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA.
University of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Real-time prediction of thermal ablation-induced cell death by echo decorrelationR01CA158439 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MAST, T DOUGLAS · 2012 to 2022
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational finite element models are commonly used for the simulation of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatments. However, the accuracy of these simulations is limited by the lack of precise knowledge of tissue parameters. In this technical note, an inverse solver based on the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) is proposed to optimize values for specific heat, thermal conductivity, and electrical conductivity resulting in accurately simulated temperature elevations. A total of 15 RFA treatments were performed on ex vivo bovine liver tissue. For each RFA treatment, 15 finite-element simulations were performed using a set of deterministically chosen tissue parameters to estimate the mean and variance of the resulting tissue ablation. The UKF was implemented as an inverse solver to recover the specific heat, thermal conductivity, and electrical conductivity corresponding to the measured area of the ablated tissue region, as determined from gross tissue histology. These tissue parameters were then employed in the finite element model to simulate the position- and time-dependent tissue temperature. Results show good agreement between simulated and measured temperature.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationComputer SimulationElectric ConductivityFinite Element AnalysisModels, BiologicalThermal ConductivityAnimalsCattleHot TemperatureLiver

Identifiers

PMID26352462
PMCPMC4609304
OpenAlexW1444973111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.