Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26352143›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

An Estimation of Private Household Costs to Receive Free Oral Cholera Vaccine in Odisha, India.

Vittal Mogasale, Shantanu K Kar, Jong-Hoon Kim, Vijayalaxmi V Mogasale, Anna S Kerketta, Bikash Patnaik, Shyam Bandhu Rath, Mahesh K Puri, Young Ae You, Hemant K Khuntia and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The cost of COVID-19 vaccine delivery in Bangladesh.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vittal MogasaleInternational Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shantanu K KarRegional Medical Research Center (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Jong-Hoon KimInternational Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Vijayalaxmi V MogasaleInternational Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Anna S KerkettaRegional Medical Research Center (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Bikash PatnaikDirectorate of Health Services (DHS), Odisha, India.
Shyam Bandhu RathRegional Medical Research Center (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Mahesh K PuriInternational Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Ae YouInternational Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hemant K KhuntiaRegional Medical Research Center (RMRC), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Brian MaskeryInternational Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Thomas F WierzbaInternational Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Binod SahInternational Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
International Vaccine Institute · KRRegional Medical Research Center · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundService provider costs for vaccine delivery have been well documented; however, vaccine recipients' costs have drawn less attention. This research explores the private household out-of-pocket and opportunity costs incurred to receive free oral cholera vaccine during a mass vaccination campaign in rural Odisha, India.

methodsFollowing a government-driven oral cholera mass vaccination campaign targeting population over one year of age, a questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was conducted to estimate private household costs among vaccine recipients. The questionnaire captured travel costs as well as time and wage loss for self and accompanying persons. The productivity loss was estimated using three methods: self-reported, government defined minimum daily wages and gross domestic product per capita in Odisha.

findingsOn average, families were located 282.7 (SD = 254.5) meters from the nearest vaccination booths. Most family members either walked or bicycled to the vaccination sites and spent on average 26.5 minutes on travel and 15.7 minutes on waiting. Depending upon the methodology, the estimated productivity loss due to potential foregone income ranged from $0.15 to $0.29 per dose of cholera vaccine received. The private household cost of receiving oral cholera vaccine constituted 24.6% to 38.0% of overall vaccine delivery costs.

interpretationThe private household costs resulting from productivity loss for receiving a free oral cholera vaccine is a substantial proportion of overall vaccine delivery cost and may influence vaccine uptake. Policy makers and program managers need to recognize the importance of private costs and consider how to balance programmatic delivery costs with private household costs to receive vaccines.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsHealth ExpendituresAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCholeraCholera VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMaleCholera Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26352143
PMCPMC4564266
OpenAlexW1800988095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.