Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26351687›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Grandmothering life histories and human pair bonding.

James E Coxworth, Peter S Kim, John S McQueen, Kristen Hawkes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A population threshold for dedicated teaching.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Revisiting "Grandmothers and the Evolution of Human Longevity" 2003 AJHB https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.10156.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Relationship between energy acquisition and family composition in hunter-gatherers.Anthropological science : journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon = Jinruigaku zasshi · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cognitive consequences of our grandmothering life history: cultural learning begins in infancy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Hunter-gatherer studies and human evolution: A very selective review.American journal of physical anthropology · 2018
    Article
  17. Sex roles and adult sex ratios: insights from mammalian biology and consequences for primate behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Evolution of male strategies with sex-ratio-dependent pay-offs: connecting pair bonds with grandmothering.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James E CoxworthDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; Utah Population Database, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; Advanced Solutions, Nielsen, Schaumburg, IL 60173;
Peter S KimSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
John S McQueenSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Kristen HawkesDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; hawkes@anthro.utah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of distinctively human life history and social organization is generally attributed to paternal provisioning based on pair bonds. Here we develop an alternative argument that connects the evolution of human pair bonds to the male-biased mating sex ratios that accompanied the evolution of human life history. We simulate an agent-based model of the grandmother hypothesis, compare simulated sex ratios to data on great apes and human hunter-gatherers, and note associations between a preponderance of males and mate guarding across taxa. Then we explore a recent model that highlights the importance of mating sex ratios for differences between birds and mammals and conclude that lessons for human evolution cannot ignore mammalian reproductive constraints. In contradiction to our claim that male-biased sex ratios are characteristically human, female-biased ratios are reported in some populations. We consider the likelihood that fertile men are undercounted and conclude that the mate-guarding hypothesis for human pair bonds gains strength from explicit links with our grandmothering life history.

Indexed as

GrandparentsLife Cycle StagesPair BondAnimalsComputer SimulationDemographyFemaleHumansMalePan troglodytesSex RatioSexual Behavior, Animalgrandmother hypothesishuman evolutionhuman life historymate guardingmating sex ratios

Identifiers

PMID26351687
PMCPMC4586877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.