Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26351410›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

"Partners rather than just providers…": A qualitative study on health care professionals' views on implementation of multidisciplinary group meetings in the North West London Integrated Care Pilot.

Angelos P Kassianos, Agnieszka Ignatowicz, Geva Greenfield, Azeem Majeed, Josip Car, Yannis Pappas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrated Care ModelInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enacting person-centredness in integrated care: A qualitative study of practice and perspectives within multidisciplinary groups in the care of older people.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  12. An integrated care programme in London: qualitative evaluation.Journal of integrated care (Brighton, England) · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Yonder: Fatigue, role models, MDT meetings, and GP signatures.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angelos P KassianosDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Agnieszka IgnatowiczSocial Science and Systems in Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Geva GreenfieldDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Azeem MajeedPrimary Care, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Josip CarDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Yannis PappasHealth Servicers Research, Institute of Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMultidisciplinary group meetings are one of the key drivers of facilitating integrated care. Health care professionals attending such groups have a key role in the success of these discussions and hence, in the forming of multi-professional integrated care. The study aimed to explore the professionals' experiences and views of participating and implementing the groups in integrated care context.

methodsA qualitative study including 25 semi-structured interviews with professionals participating in the Northwest London Integrated Care Pilot analysed using thematic content analysis.

resultsParticipants mentioned a number of benefits of participating in the meetings, including shared learning and shared decision-making between different services and specialties. Yet, they perceived barriers that diminish the efficiency of the groups, such as time constraints, group dynamics and technicalities. The participants felt that the quality of discussions and facilitation could be improved, as well as technical arrangements that would make them easier to participate. Most of the participants perceived the groups to be beneficial for providers mostly questioning the benefits for patient care.

conclusionFindings provide an insight into how health professionals' views of their participation to the multidisciplinary group meetings can be more effectively translated into more tangible benefits to the patients. To benefit patient care, the multidisciplinary groups need to be more patient-oriented rather than provider-oriented, while overcoming professional boundaries for participating.

Indexed as

collaborationhealth care professionalshealth servicesintegrated caremultidisciplinary groupsqualitative

Identifiers

PMID26351410
PMCPMC4560079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.