SynthesisInternational journal of epidemiology2015
Effects of MVA85A vaccine on tuberculosis challenge in animals: systematic review.
Synthesis in International journal of epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- MVA85A vaccine to enhance BCG for preventing tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Controlled human infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: practical considerations for clinical trials.The Lancet. Microbe · 2026Review
- Development and preclinical evaluation of next-generation ΔsigH-based live candidate vaccines.JCI insight · 2025Article
- The Impact of Animal Models and Strain Standardization on the Evaluation of Tuberculosis Vaccine Efficacy.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Efficacy and immunogenicity of rKVAC85B in a BCG prime-boost regimen against H37Rv and HN878 Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains.PloS one · 2025Article
- Host and pathogen genetic diversity shape vaccine-mediated protection toFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Review
- The role of systematic reviews in identifying the limitations of preclinical animal research, 2000-2022: part 2.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2022Article
- Reviewing the animal literature: how to describe and choose between different types of literature reviews.Laboratory animals · 2021Article
- Neonatal and infant immunity for tuberculosis vaccine development: importance of age-matched animal models.Disease models & mechanisms · 2020Review
- Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Can prospective systematic reviews of animal studies improve clinical translation?Journal of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Vaccine vectors: the bright side of cytomegalovirus.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2019Review
- Tuberculosis susceptibility and protection in children.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2019Review
- An Auto-luminescent Fluorescent BCG Whole Blood Assay to Enable Evaluation of Paediatric Mycobacterial Responses Using Minimal Blood Volumes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
- Lipoarabinomannan in Active and Passive Protection Against Tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- The current status, challenges, and future developments of new tuberculosis vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018Review
- Effects of MVA85A vaccine on tuberculosis challenge in animals: systematic review.International journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
- Novel vaccination approaches to prevent tuberculosis in children.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2016Review
- MTBVAC vaccine is safe, immunogenic and confers protective efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in newborn mice.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe existing Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination provides partial protection against tuberculosis (TB). The modified vaccinia ankara virus-expressing antigen 85A (MVA85A) aims to boost BCG immunity. We evaluated the animal evidence supporting the testing of MVA85A in humans.
methodsOur protocol included in vivo preclinical studies of the MVA85A booster with BCG compared with BCG alone, followed by a TB challenge. We used standard methods for systematic review of animal studies, and summarized mortality, measures of pathology and lung bacterial load. The comprehensive literature search was to September 2014. Two independent investigators assessed eligibility and performed data extraction. We assessed study quality and pooled bacteria load using random effect meta-analysis.
findingsWe included eight studies in 192 animals. Three experiments were in mice, two in guinea pigs, two in macaques and one in calves. Overall, study quality was low with no randomization, baseline comparability not described and blinding not reported. For animal death (including euthanasia due to severe morbidity), studies were underpowered, and overall no benefit demonstrated. No difference was shown for lung pathology measured on an ordinal scale or bacterial load. The largest mortality trial carried out in macaques had more deaths in the MVA85A vaccine group, and was published after a trial in South Africa had started recruiting children.
conclusionsThis independent assessment of the animal data does not provide evidence to support efficacy of MVA85A as a BCG booster. More rigorous conduct and reporting of preclinical research are warranted, and we believe the results of studies should be publicly available before embarking on trials in humans, irrespective of the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.