Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26351306›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of epidemiology2015

Effects of MVA85A vaccine on tuberculosis challenge in animals: systematic review.

Rufaro Kashangura, Emily S Sena, Taryn Young, Paul Garner

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. MVA85A vaccine to enhance BCG for preventing tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vaccine vectors: the bright side of cytomegalovirus.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2019
    Review
  14. Tuberculosis susceptibility and protection in children.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rufaro KashanguraFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa. rufarokash12@yahoo.co.uk
Emily S Sena
Taryn Young
Paul Garner

Funding

PHS HHS T84HA21652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe existing Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination provides partial protection against tuberculosis (TB). The modified vaccinia ankara virus-expressing antigen 85A (MVA85A) aims to boost BCG immunity. We evaluated the animal evidence supporting the testing of MVA85A in humans.

methodsOur protocol included in vivo preclinical studies of the MVA85A booster with BCG compared with BCG alone, followed by a TB challenge. We used standard methods for systematic review of animal studies, and summarized mortality, measures of pathology and lung bacterial load. The comprehensive literature search was to September 2014. Two independent investigators assessed eligibility and performed data extraction. We assessed study quality and pooled bacteria load using random effect meta-analysis.

findingsWe included eight studies in 192 animals. Three experiments were in mice, two in guinea pigs, two in macaques and one in calves. Overall, study quality was low with no randomization, baseline comparability not described and blinding not reported. For animal death (including euthanasia due to severe morbidity), studies were underpowered, and overall no benefit demonstrated. No difference was shown for lung pathology measured on an ordinal scale or bacterial load. The largest mortality trial carried out in macaques had more deaths in the MVA85A vaccine group, and was published after a trial in South Africa had started recruiting children.

conclusionsThis independent assessment of the animal data does not provide evidence to support efficacy of MVA85A as a BCG booster. More rigorous conduct and reporting of preclinical research are warranted, and we believe the results of studies should be publicly available before embarking on trials in humans, irrespective of the findings.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial LoadCattleDisease Models, AnimalGuinea PigsLungMacacaMiceMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisTuberculosis, PulmonaryTuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNAMVA 85ATuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26351306
PMCPMC4689998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.