Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26350998›Full record

Trial reportAnaesthesia2015

The discriminatory value of cardiorespiratory interactions in distinguishing awake from anaesthetised states: a randomised observational study.

D A Kenwright, A Bernjak, T Draegni, S Dzeroski, M Entwistle, M Horvat, P Kvandal, S A Landsverk, P V E McClintock, B Musizza and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anaesthesia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Heart rate variability in anaesthesiology - narrative review.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Alterations in the coupling functions between cortical and cardio-respiratory oscillations due to anaesthesia with propofol and sevoflurane.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

D A KenwrightLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
A BernjakLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
T DraegniOslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway.
S DzeroskiJožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
M EntwistleRoyal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK.
M HorvatFaculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
P KvandalOslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway.
S A LandsverkOslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway.
P V E McClintockLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
B MusizzaJožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J PetrovčičJožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J RaederOslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway.
L W SheppardLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
A F SmithRoyal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK.
T StankovskiLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
A StefanovskaLancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Lancaster University · GBOslo University Hospital · NOJožef Stefan Institute · SIRoyal Lancaster Infirmary · GBUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depth of anaesthesia monitors usually analyse cerebral function with or without other physiological signals; non-invasive monitoring of the measured cardiorespiratory signals alone would offer a simple, practical alternative. We aimed to investigate whether such signals, analysed with novel, non-linear dynamic methods, would distinguish between the awake and anaesthetised states. We recorded ECG, respiration, skin temperature, pulse and skin conductivity before and during general anaesthesia in 27 subjects in good cardiovascular health, randomly allocated to receive propofol or sevoflurane. Mean values, variability and dynamic interactions were determined. Respiratory rate (p = 0.0002), skin conductivity (p = 0.03) and skin temperature (p = 0.00006) changed with sevoflurane, and skin temperature (p = 0.0005) with propofol. Pulse transit time increased by 17% with sevoflurane (p = 0.02) and 11% with propofol (p = 0.007). Sevoflurane reduced the wavelet energy of heart (p = 0.0004) and respiratory (p = 0.02) rate variability at all frequencies, whereas propofol decreased only the heart rate variability below 0.021 Hz (p < 0.05). The phase coherence was reduced by both agents at frequencies below 0.145 Hz (p < 0.05), whereas the cardiorespiratory synchronisation time was increased (p < 0.05). A classification analysis based on an optimal set of discriminatory parameters distinguished with 95% success between the awake and anaesthetised states. We suggest that these results can contribute to the design of new monitors of anaesthetic depth based on cardiovascular signals alone.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaHeart RateMethyl EthersPropofolRespirationWakefulnessAdultElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSevofluraneSkin TemperatureMethyl EthersPropofolSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID26350998
PMCPMC4989441
OpenAlexW2148631583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.