Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26350930›Full record

ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2015

Where Is Buprenorphine Dispensed to Treat Opioid Use Disorders? The Role of Private Offices, Opioid Treatment Programs, and Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in Urban and Rural Counties.

Bradley D Stein, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Adam J Gordon, Rachel M Burns, Douglas L Leslie, Mark J Sorbero, Sebastian Bauhoff, Todd W Mandell, Andrew W Dick

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rural Clients' Continuity Into Follow-Up Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Impacts of Travel Time, Incentives, and Alerts.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Physicians' satisfaction with providing buprenorphine treatment.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2019
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Trends in Geographic Proximity to Substance Use Disorder Treatment.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bradley D SteinRAND Corporation.
Rosalie Liccardo PaculaRAND Corporation.
Adam J GordonUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Rachel M BurnsRAND Corporation.
Douglas L LesliePenn State College of Medicine.
Mark J SorberoRAND Corporation.
Sebastian BauhoffRAND Corporation.
Todd W MandellCommunity Substance Abuse Centers.
Andrew W DickRAND Corporation.
RAND Corporation · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System · US

Funding

Opioid Agonist Treatment Expansion in Medicaid: The Role of BuprenorphineR01DA032881 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI STEIN, BRADLEY D · 2012 to 2014
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS 1R01DA032881-01A1NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

policy pointsBuprenorphine is an effective opioid dependence treatment that has expanded access to care since its 2002 approval, but it can only be prescribed by physicians waivered to treat a limited number of individuals. We examined the impact of 2006 legislation that increased waivered physician patient limits from 30 to 100 on buprenorphine use, and found that 100-patient-waivered physicians were significantly associated with growth in buprenorphine use, with no such relationship for 30-patient-waivered physicians. Policies relaxing patient limits may be more effective in increasing buprenorphine use than alternatives such as opening new substance abuse treatment facilities or increasing the overall number of waivered physicians. CONTEXT: Opioid use disorders are a significant public health problem. In 2002, the FDA approved buprenorphine as an opioid use disorder treatment when prescribed by waivered physicians who were limited to treating 30 patients at a time. In 2006, federal legislation raised this number to 100 patients. Although federal legislators are considering increasing these limits further and expanding prescribing privileges to nonphysicians, little information is available regarding the impact of such changes on buprenorphine use. We therefore examined the impact of the 2006 legislation-as well as the association between urban and rural waivered physicians, opioid treatment programs, and substance abuse treatment facilities-on buprenorphine distributed per capita over the past decade.

methodsUsing 2004-2011 state-level data on buprenorphine dispensed and county-level data on the number of buprenorphine-waivered physicians and substance abuse treatment facilities using buprenorphine, we estimated a multivariate ordinary least squares regression model with state fixed effects of a state's annual total buprenorphine dispensed per capita as a function of the state's number of buprenorphine providers.

findingsThe amount of buprenorphine dispensed has been increasing at a greater rate than the number of buprenorphine providers. The number of physicians waivered to treat 100 patients with buprenorphine in both rural and urban settings was significantly associated with increased amounts of buprenorphine dispensed per capita. There was no significant association in the growth of buprenorphine distributed and the number of physicians with 30-patient waivers.

conclusionsThe greater amounts of buprenorphine dispensed are consistent with the potentially greater use of opioid agonists for opioid use disorder treatment, though they also make their misuse more likely. The changes after the 2006 legislation suggest that policies focused on increasing the number of patients that a single waivered physician could safely and effectively treat could be more effective in increasing buprenorphine use than would alternatives such as opening new substance abuse treatment facilities or raising the overall number of waivered physicians.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineDrug PrescriptionsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentPhysiciansPrivate PracticePublic PolicyRural Health ServicesSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesUrban Health ServicesBuprenorphineNarcotic Antagonistsbuprenorphinehealth policyopioid-related disorderssubstance abuse treatment

Identifiers

PMID26350930
PMCPMC4567853
OpenAlexW2138123339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.