E-cigarettes need to be tested for safety under realistic conditions.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Daily exposure to formaldehyde and acetaldehyde and potential health risk associated with use of high and low nicotine e-liquid concentrations.Scientific reports · 2020
   Trial
2. Flavoured Vaping Products in Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Regulatory Perspective.Cureus · 2025
   Review
3. Critical Review of the Recent Literature on Organic Byproducts in E-Cigarette Aerosol Emissions.Toxics · 2022
   Review
4. E-cigarettes and their impact on health: from pharmacology to clinical implications.Polish archives of internal medicine · 2020
   Review
5. Determination of Selected Chemical Levels in Room Air and on Surfaces after the Use of Cartridge- and Tank-Based E-Vapor Products or Conventional Cigarettes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Formaldehyde from e-cigarettes--it's not as simple as some suggest.2015

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as