Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26350628›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Interaction of Piriformospora indica with Azotobacter chroococcum.

Soubhagya Kumar Bhuyan, Prasun Bandyopadhyay, Pramod Kumar, Deepak Kumar Mishra, Ramraj Prasad, Abha Kumari, Kailash Chandra Upadhyaya, Ajit Varma, Pramod Kumar Yadava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Impact ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  3. Research Progress ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Interaction studies ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  5. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Beneficial Endophytic Bacteria-Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Soubhagya Kumar BhuyanApplied Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India.
Prasun BandyopadhyayAmity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University, Noida-201303, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Pramod KumarApplied Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India.
Deepak Kumar MishraApplied Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India.
Ramraj PrasadApplied Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India.
Abha KumariApplied Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India.
Kailash Chandra UpadhyayaAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida-201301, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ajit VarmaAmity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University, Noida-201303, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Pramod Kumar YadavaApplied Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India.
Jawaharlal Nehru University · INInstitute of Microbial Technology · INAmity University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities in rhizosphere interact with each other and form a basis of a cumulative impact on plant growth. Rhizospheric microorganisms like Piriformospora indica and Azotobacter chroococcum are well known for their beneficial interaction with plants. These features make P. indica/A. chroococcum co-inoculation of crops most promising with respect to sustainable agriculture and to understanding the transitions in the evolution of rhizospheric microbiome. Here, we investigated interactions of P. indica with A. chroococcum in culture. Out of five Azotobacter strains tested, WR5 exhibited growth-promoting while strain M4 exerted growth-inhibitory effect on the fungus in axenic culture. Electron microscopy of co-culture indicated an intimate association of the bacterium with the fungus. 2-D gel electrophoresis followed by mass spectrometry of P. indica cellular proteins grown with or without WR5 and M4 showed differential expression of many metabolic proteins like enolase-I, ureaseD, the GTP binding protein YPT1 and the transmembrane protein RTM1. Fungal growth as influenced by bacterial crude metabolites was also monitored. Taken together, the results conform to a model where WR5 and M4 influence the overall growth and physiology of P. indica which may have a bearing on its symbiotic relationship with plants.

Indexed as

Microbial InteractionsAzotobacterBasidiomycotaFungal ProteinsProteomeProteomicsSecondary MetabolismFungal ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID26350628
PMCPMC4563567
OpenAlexW2394670108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.