Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26350398›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2019

Estimating Directed Connectivity from Cortical Recordings and Reconstructed Sources.

Margarita Papadopoulou, Karl Friston, Daniele Marinazzo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Facial Expressions Evoke Differential Neural Coupling in Macaques.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Convergent evidence for hierarchical prediction networks from human electrocorticography and magnetoencephalography.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Margarita PapadopoulouDepartment of Data Analysis, University of Ghent, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Karl FristonThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Daniele MarinazzoDepartment of Data Analysis, University of Ghent, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. daniele.marinazzo@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0002-9803-0122
Ghent University · BEWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088130Wellcome Trust 088130/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cognitive neuroscience, electrical brain activity is most commonly recorded at the scalp. In order to infer the contributions and connectivity of underlying neuronal sources within the brain, it is necessary to reconstruct sensor data at the source level. Several approaches to this reconstruction have been developed, thereby solving the so-called implicit inverse problem Michel et al. (Clin Neurophysiol 115:2195-2222, 2004). However, a unifying premise against which to validate these source reconstructions is seldom available. The dataset provided in this work, in which brain activity is simultaneously recorded on the scalp (non-invasively) by electroencephalography (EEG) and on the cortex (invasively) by electrocorticography (ECoG), can be of a great help in this direction. These multimodal recordings were obtained from a macaque monkey under wakefulness and sedation. Our primary goal was to establish the connectivity architecture between two sources of interest (frontal and parietal), and to assess how their coupling changes over the conditions. We chose these sources because previous studies have shown that the connections between them are modified by anaesthesia Boly et al. (J Neurosci 32:7082-7090, 2012). Our secondary goal was to evaluate the consistency of the connectivity results when analyzing sources recorded from invasive data (128 implanted ECoG sources) and source activity reconstructed from scalp recordings (19 EEG sensors) at the same locations as the ECoG sources. We conclude that the directed connectivity in the frequency domain between cortical sources reconstructed from scalp EEG is qualitatively similar to the connectivity inferred directly from cortical recordings, using both data-driven (directed transfer function) and biologically grounded (dynamic causal modelling) methods. Furthermore, the connectivity changes identified were consistent with previous findings Boly et al. (J Neurosci 32:7082-7090, 2012). Our findings suggest that inferences about directed connectivity based upon non-invasive electrophysiological data have construct validity in relation to invasive recordings.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingElectrocorticographyElectroencephalographyHumansBrain connectivityDirected transfer functionDynamic causal modeling

Identifiers

PMID26350398
PMCPMC6592960
OpenAlexW2103990426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.