Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26350246›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular modeling2015

Computational approaches to study the effects of small genomic variations.

Kamil Khafizov, Maxim V Ivanov, Olga V Glazova, Sergei P Kovalenko

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular modeling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamil KhafizovMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russian Federation, kkhafizov@gmail.com.
Maxim V Ivanov
Olga V Glazova
Sergei P Kovalenko

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in DNA sequencing technologies have led to an avalanche-like increase in the number of gene sequences deposited in public databases over the last decade as well as the detection of an enormous number of previously unseen nucleotide variants therein. Given the size and complex nature of the genome-wide sequence variation data, as well as the rate of data generation, experimental characterization of the disease association of each of these variations or their effects on protein structure/function would be costly, laborious, time-consuming, and essentially impossible. Thus, in silico methods to predict the functional effects of sequence variations are constantly being developed. In this review, we summarize the major computational approaches and tools that are aimed at the prediction of the functional effect of mutations, and describe the state-of-the-art databases that can be used to obtain information about mutation significance. We also discuss future directions in this highly competitive field.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidGenetic VariationComputational BiologyConserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularGenomicsHumansMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideStructure-Activity RelationshipWeb BrowserWorkflow

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.