ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2016
Ultra-Rapid Categorization of Meaningful Real-Life Scenes in Adults With and Without ASD.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protracted development of gaze behaviour.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Task-evoked pupil responses during free-viewing of hierarchical figures in relation to autistic traits in adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Atypical Brain Connectivity During Pragmatic and Semantic Language Processing in Children with Autism.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Ultrafast Image Categorization in Biology and Neural Models.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Is the dolphin a fish? ERP evidence for the impact of typicality during early visual processing in ultra-rapid semantic categorization in autism spectrum disorder.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2022Article
- Brief Report: Preferred Processing of Social Stimuli in Autism: A Perception Task.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Article
- Are Executive Dysfunctions Relevant for the Autism-Specific Cognitive Profile?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Neural-level associations of non-verbal pragmatic comprehension in young Finnish autistic adults.International journal of circumpolar health · 2021Article
- Processing of pragmatic communication in ASD: a video-based brain imaging study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Local Versus Global Processing in Autism: Special Section Editorial.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018Article
- Brief Report: Intuitive and Reflective Reasoning in Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2017Article
- In the Eye of the Beholder: Rapid Visual Perception of Real-Life Scenes by Young Adults with and Without ASD.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In comparison to typically developing (TD) individuals, people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) appear to be worse in the fast extraction of the global meaning of a situation or picture. Ultra-rapid categorization [paradigm developed by Thorpe et al. (Nature 381:520-522, 1996)] involves such global information processing. We therefore tested a group of adults with and without ASD, without intellectual disability, on a set of ultra-rapid categorization tasks. Individuals with ASD performed equally well as TD individuals except when the task required the categorization of social interactions. These results argue against a general deficit in ultra-rapid gist perception in people with ASD, while suggesting a more specific problem with the fast processing of information about social relations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26349920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.