Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26349751›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

Development of a multi-marker model combining HE4, CA125, progesterone, and estradiol for distinguishing benign from malignant pelvic masses in postmenopausal women.

Pengjun Zhang, Chuanxin Wang, Liming Cheng, Peng Zhang, Lin Guo, Wanli Liu, Zhongying Zhang, Yanchun Huang, Qishui Ou, Xinyu Wen and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Pengjun ZhangCore Laboratory of Translational Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chuanxin WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Liming ChengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Lin GuoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Wanli LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Zhongying ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yanchun HuangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The Tumor Hospital Affiliated to XinJiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Qishui OuDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xinyu WenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, State Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yaping TianCore Laboratory of Translational Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. tianyp61@gmail.com.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNTumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CNZhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate HE4, CA125, progesterone (Prog), and estradiol (E2) for differentiating pelvic masses in postmenopausal women and aimed to build a multi-marker model which may improve the diagnostic value. HE4, CA125, Prog, and E2 were detected in 57 benign pelvic masses (BPM) and 92 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. A total of 66.66 % of the BPM and EOC serum samples were used for building the differentiation model, and the remaining 33.33 % of the BPM and EOC serum samples were used for validation of the differentiation model. After comparing by Z score statistics, HE4 + CA125 + E2 model was chosen as the best multi-marker model. In the training group, the area under curve of the HE4 + CA125 + E2 model was 0.97 (0.93, 1.00), sensitivities of the model for distinguishing BPM from EOC, from early EOC, and from advanced EOC were 90.16, 86.21, and 95.65 %; specificities were 92.11, 92.11, and 92.11 %. In the validation group, sensitivities of HE4 + CA125 + E2 model for distinguishing BPM from EOC, from early EOC, and from advanced EOC were 96.77, 100.00, and 87.50 %, specificities were 84.21, 100.00, and 84.21 %. The multi-marker model showed significant improvement when compared to CA125 or HE4, and it might be an effective pelvic mass differentiation method.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialEstradiolFemaleHumansLuminescent MeasurementsMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPostmenopauseBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenEstradiolMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, humanProgesteroneProteinsWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2WFDC2 protein, humanCarbohydrate antigen 125Epithelial ovarian cancerEstradiolHuman epididymis protein 4Pelvic massProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID26349751
OpenAlexW1767610668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.