Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26349657›Full record

ArticleMucosal immunology2016

Cervicovaginal microbiome dysbiosis is associated with proteome changes related to alterations of the cervicovaginal mucosal barrier.

H Borgdorff, R Gautam, S D Armstrong, D Xia, G F Ndayisaba, N H van Teijlingen, T B H Geijtenbeek, J M Wastling, J H H M van de Wijgert

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mucosal immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 274 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness ofThe Journal of international medical research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Disrupted Cervicovaginal Microbiota: Its Role inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

H BorgdorffAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD) and Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R GautamInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
S D ArmstrongInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
D XiaInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
G F NdayisabaRinda Ubuzima, Kigali, Rwanda.
N H van TeijlingenDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T B H GeijtenbeekDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J M WastlingInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J H H M van de WijgertInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBAcademic Medical Center · NLAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginal microbiome (VMB) dysbiosis is associated with increased acquisition of HIV. Cervicovaginal inflammation and other changes to the mucosal barrier are thought to have important roles but human data are scarce. We compared the human cervicovaginal proteome by mass spectrometry of 50 Rwandan female sex workers who had previously been clustered into four VMB groups using a 16S phylogenetic microarray; in order of increasing bacterial diversity: Lactobacillus crispatus-dominated VMB (group 1), Lactobacillus iners-dominated VMB (group 2), moderate dysbiosis (group 3), and severe dysbiosis (group 4). We compared relative protein abundances among these VMB groups using targeted (abundance of pre-defined mucosal barrier proteins) and untargeted (differentially abundant proteins among all human proteins identified) approaches. With increasing bacterial diversity, we found: mucus alterations (increasing mucin 5B and 5AC), cytoskeleton alterations (increasing actin-organizing proteins; decreasing keratins and cornified envelope proteins), increasing lactate dehydrogenase A/B as markers of cell death, increasing proteolytic activity (increasing proteasome core complex proteins/proteases; decreasing antiproteases), altered antimicrobial peptide balance (increasing psoriasin, calprotectin, and histones; decreasing lysozyme and ubiquitin), increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, and decreasing immunoglobulins immunoglobulin G1/2. Although temporal relationships cannot be derived, our findings support the hypothesis that dysbiosis causes cervicovaginal inflammation and other detrimental changes to the mucosal barrier.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAdultCytokinesDisease ProgressionDysbiosisFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInflammation MediatorsLactobacillus crispatusMass SpectrometryMicroarray AnalysisMicrobiotaMucous MembraneProteomeCytokinesInflammation MediatorsProteome

Identifiers

PMID26349657
OpenAlexW1474461326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.