Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26349557›Full record

SynthesisJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2015

Clinical relevance of nalmefene versus placebo in alcohol treatment: reduction in mortality risk.

Michael Roerecke, Per Sørensen, Philippe Laramée, Nora Rahhali, Jürgen Rehm

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Estimating Long-Term Drinking Patterns for People with Lifetime Alcohol Use Disorder.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael RoereckeSocial and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada Dalla Lana School of Public Health (DLSPH), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada michael.roerecke@camh.ca.
Per SørensenH. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.
Philippe LaraméeLundbeck SAS, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Villeurbanne, France.
Nora RahhaliLundbeck SAS, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Jürgen RehmSocial and Epidemiological Research Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada Dalla Lana School of Public Health (DLSPH), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Issy Media (France) · FRCentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CALundbeck (Denmark) · DKPublic Health Ontario · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reduction of long-term mortality risk, an important clinical outcome for people in alcohol dependence treatment, can rarely be established in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We calculated the reduction in all-cause mortality risk using data from short-term (6 and 12 months) double-blind RCTs comparing as-needed nalmefene treatment to placebo, and mortality risks from meta-analyses on all-cause-mortality risk by reduction of drinking in people with alcohol dependence. A reduction in drinking in the RCTs was defined by shifts in drinking risk levels established by the European Medicines Agency. Results showed that the reduction of drinking in the nalmefene group was associated with a reduction in mortality risk by 8% (95% CI: 2%, 13%) when compared to the placebo group. Sensitivity analyses confirmed a significant effect. Thus comparing the difference between nalmefene and placebo in reduction in drinking levels with results on all-cause mortality risk from meta-analyses indicated a clinically relevant reduction in mortality risk. Given the high mortality risk of people with alcohol dependence, abstinence or a reduction in drinking have been shown to reduce mortality risk and should be considered treatment goals.

Indexed as

AlcoholismDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsPlacebosRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicnalmefeneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsPlacebosAlcohol dependencealcohol treatmentclinical relevancemeta-analysismortalitynalmefeneplacebo

Identifiers

PMID26349557
PMCPMC4623485
OpenAlexW2132168868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.