Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26349472›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2015

Assessing Walking and Cycling Environments in the Streets of Madrid: Comparing On-Field and Virtual Audits.

Pedro Gullón, Hannah M Badland, Silvia Alfayate, Usama Bilal, Francisco Escobar, Alba Cebrecos, Julia Diez, Manuel Franco

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Scoping Review of Bikeability Assessment Methods.Journal of community health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation of the Urban Walkability Perception Questionnaire (UWPQ) in the Balearic Islands.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Assessing Google Street View Image Availability in Latin American Cities.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Measuring Neighborhood Walkable Environments: A Comparison of Three Approaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  19. Validation of a Google Street View-Based Neighborhood Disorder Observational Scale.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pedro GullónSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28871, Spain. pgullon@isciii.es.
Hannah M BadlandMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Silvia AlfayateSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28871, Spain.
Usama BilalSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28871, Spain.
Francisco EscobarSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28871, Spain.
Alba CebrecosSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28871, Spain.
Julia DiezSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28871, Spain.
Manuel FrancoSocial and Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Group, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28871, Spain. mfranco@uah.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Audit tools are useful for exploring the urban environment and its association with physical activity. Virtual auditing options are becoming increasingly available potentially reducing the resources needed to conduct these assessments. Only a few studies have explored the use of virtual audit tools. Our objective is to test if the Madrid Systematic Pedestrian and Cycling Environment Scan (M-SPACES) discriminates between areas with different urban forms and to validate virtual street auditing using M-SPACES. Three areas (N = 500 street segments) were selected for variation in population density. M-SPACES was used to audit street segments physically and virtually (Google Street View) by two researchers in 2013-2014. For both physical and virtual audits, all analyzed features score significantly different by area (p < 0.05). Most of the features showed substantial (ICC = 0.6-0.8) or almost perfect (ICC ≥ 0.8) agreement between virtual and physical audits, especially neighborhood permeability walking infrastructure, traffic safety, streetscape aesthetics, and destinations. Intra-rater agreement was generally acceptable (ICC > 0.6). Inter-rater agreement was generally poor (ICC < 0.4). Virtual auditing provides a valid and feasible way of measuring residential urban environments. Comprehensive auditor training may be needed to guarantee good inter-rater agreement.

Indexed as

BicyclingCitiesData CollectionEnvironment DesignHumansSafetySpainWalkingOmnidirectional imagePhysical activityUrban environmentValidation studiesVirtual image

Identifiers

PMID26349472
PMCPMC4608939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.