Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26349433›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental nephrology2016

Pathological sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of tonsillectomy combined with steroid pulse therapy versus steroid pulse monotherapy in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy.

Ritsuko Katafuchi, Tetsuya Kawamura, Kensuke Joh, Akinori Hashiguchi, Satoshi Hisano, Akira Shimizu, Yoichi Miyazaki, Masaharu Nagata, Seiichi Matsuo, IgA nephropathy Study Group in Japan

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Contemporary review of IgA nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ritsuko KatafuchiKidney Unit, National Fukuoka-Higashi Medical Center, 1-1-1, Chidori, Koga-City, Fukuoka, 811-3195, Japan. katafuchir@fukuokae2.hosp.go.jp.
Tetsuya KawamuraDivision of Kidney and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kensuke JohDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Akinori HashiguchiDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi HisanoDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Akira ShimizuDepartment of Pathology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoichi MiyazakiDivision of Kidney and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaharu NagataDepartment of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Seiichi MatsuoDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nagoya, Nagoya, Japan.
IgA nephropathy Study Group in Japan
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPNihon University · JPFukuoka Higashi Medical Center · JPKeio University · JPKyushu University · JPNagoya University · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe IgA nephropathy (IgAN) Study Group in Japan conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of tonsillectomy with steroid pulse therapy (TSP) versus steroid pulse monotherapy in patients with IgAN (UMIN Clinical Trial Registry Number; C000000384). The effects of therapies in relation to pathological severity were analyzed in this study.

methodsThe patients with IgAN, urinary protein 1.0-3.5 g/day, serum creatinine of 1.5 mg/dl or less were randomly assigned to receiving TSP (Group A) or steroid pulses alone (Group B). The primary endpoint was the disappearance of proteinuria and/or hematuria. Twenty-six biopsies in Group A and 33 in Group B were available. The histological grades (HG) according to the percentage of glomeruli with crescent or sclerosis and the Oxford classification were analyzed.

resultsThe patients in Group A had a 4.32- to 12.1-fold greater benefit of disappearance of proteinuria and 3.61- to 8.17-fold greater benefit of clinical remission (disappearance of proteinuria and hematuria) than those in Group B in patients with HG2-3, acute lesions (cellular or fibrocellular crescent) affecting more than 5 % of glomeruli, chronic lesions (fibrous crescents or sclerosis) affecting more than 20 % and S1. In contrast, odds ratios for disappearance of proteinuria or clinical remission in Group A to Group B were not significant in patients with HG 1, acute lesion in 5 % or less of glomeruli, chronic lesion in 20 % or less and S0. The disappearance of hematuria showed no relation to pathological severity.

conclusionTSP might be better employed according to the pathological severity.

Indexed as

TonsillectomyAdolescentAdultAgedChildCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGlomerulonephritis, IGAGlucocorticoidsHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedPrednisoloneYoung AdultGlucocorticoidsPrednisoloneIgA nephropathyPathologyRandomized controlled trialSteroid pulse therapyTonsillectomy

Identifiers

PMID26349433
PMCPMC4819588
OpenAlexW1939237268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.