Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26349415›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in oncogenesis2015

Osteosarcoma Genetics and Epigenetics: Emerging Biology and Candidate Therapies.

James J Morrow, Chand Khanna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in oncogenesis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic Targeting of BET Proteins in Sarcoma.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Whole-Exome Analysis and Osteosarcoma: A Game Still Open.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Targeting the EphA2 pathway: could it be the way for bone sarcomas?Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  18. Cancers · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James J MorrowDepartment of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Chand KhannaCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
Defining novel drivers and predictive signatures of metastasis in osteosarcoma thF30CA186633 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MORROW, JAMES JULIUS · 2014 to 2017
$182k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA186633NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignancy of bone, typically presenting in the first or second decade of life. Unfortunately, clinical outcomes for osteosarcoma patients have not substantially improved in over 30 years. This stagnation in therapeutic advances is perhaps explained by the genetic, epigenetic, and biological complexities of this rare tumor. In this review we provide a general background on the biology of osteosarcoma and the clinical status quo. We go on to enumerate the genetic and epigenetic defects identified in osteosarcoma. Finally, we discuss ongoing large-scale studies in the field and potential new therapies that are currently under investigation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone NeoplasmsEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic Association StudiesHumansMicroRNAsOsteosarcomaMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID26349415
PMCPMC4894524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.