Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26348847›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Effectiveness of Home Visits in Pregnancy as a Public Health Measure to Improve Birth Outcomes.

Kayoko Ichikawa, Takeo Fujiwara, Takeo Nakayama

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04628598 (Effects of The Pregnant Follow-Up Conducted With Home Visits on The Perinatal Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04628598 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of The Pregnant Follow-Up Conducted With Home Visits on The Perinatal Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaRan2020 to 2022Enrolled64ConditionsPregnancy Related, Prenatal CareArmsAntenatal care and prenatal education with a home visit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kayoko IchikawaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Social Medicine, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeo FujiwaraDepartment of Social Medicine, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeo NakayamaDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBirth outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA), are crucial indicators of child development and health. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether home visits from public health nurses for high-risk pregnant women prevent adverse birth outcomes.

methodsIn this quasi-experimental cohort study in Kyoto city, Japan, high-risk pregnant women were defined as teenage girls (range 14-19 years old), women with a twin pregnancy, women who registered their pregnancy late, had a physical or mental illness, were of single marital status, non-Japanese women who were not fluent in Japanese, or elderly primiparas. We collected data from all high-risk pregnant women at pregnancy registration interviews held at a public health centers between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2012, as well as birth outcomes when delivered from the Maternal and Child Health Handbook (N = 964), which is a record of prenatal check-ups, delivery, child development and vaccinations. Of these women, 622 women were selected based on the home-visit program propensity score-matched sample (pair of N = 311) and included in the analysis. Data were analyzed between January and June 2014.

resultsIn the propensity score-matched sample, women who received the home-visit program had lower odds of preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.98) and showed a 0.55-week difference in gestational age (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.92) compared to the matched controlled sample. Although the program did not prevent LBW and SGA, children born to mothers who received the program showed an increase in birth weight by 107.8 g (95% CI: 27.0 to 188.5).

conclusionHome visits by public health nurses for high-risk pregnant women in Japan might be effective in preventing preterm birth, but not SGA.

Indexed as

House CallsPublic HealthAdolescentBirth WeightChild HealthChild PsychiatryFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornJapanNursesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePremature Birth

Identifiers

PMID26348847
PMCPMC4562632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.