Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26348734›Full record

Observational studyJAMA internal medicine2015

Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.

Christopher R Polage, Clare E Gyorke, Michael A Kennedy, Jhansi L Leslie, David L Chin, Susan Wang, Hien H Nguyen, Bin Huang, Yi-Wei Tang, Lenora W Lee and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03030248 (Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 280 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
280citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
39.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03030248 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT)+/Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA)- Clostridium Difficile in the Hematology Oncology Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2018 to 2020Enrolled9ConditionsClostridium Difficile Infection, Hematologic Diseases, Bone Marrow Transplant, Oncologic DisordersArmsVancomycin Oral Capsule, Placebo Oral Capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

280 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 565 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Clostridioides difficile Near-Patient Testing Versus Centralized Testing: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Trial
  5. SER-109, an Investigational Microbiome Drug to Reduce Recurrence After Clostridioides difficile Infection: Lessons Learned From a Phase 2 Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Prevalence ofCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2026
    Article
  8. Evaluation of the STANDARD M10 and XpertMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Treating Initial and RecurrentMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Risk factors for progression fromInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  18. A novel RNA nucleic acid amplification test more accurately distinguishes activemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

220 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher R PolageDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Clare E GyorkeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Michael A KennedyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Jhansi L LeslieDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento3Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
David L ChinCenter for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis, Sacramento.
Susan WangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento5Yolo County Health Department, Woodland, California.
Hien H NguyenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Bin HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York7Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yi-Wei TangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York8Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.
Lenora W LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Kyoungmi KimDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Sandra TaylorDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Patrick S RomanoCenter for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis, Sacramento10Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento11Division of General Pediatrics, Department.
Edward A PanacekDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Parker B GoodellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Jay V SolnickDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento13Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Stuart H CohenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
University of California, Davis · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCenter For Policy Research · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
UC DAVIS CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER: BPCAUL1RR024146 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2006 to 2011
$27.0M
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000002 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2012 to 2015
$12.2M
Quality Safety Comparative Effectiveness Research Training (QSCERT)T32HS022236 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MELNIKOW, JOY · 2013 to 2018
$2.1M
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterTL1RR024145 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2006 to 2011
$814k
UC Davis Clinical and Translational Science CenterTL1TR000133 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2012 to 2015
$594k
AHRQ HHS T32 HS022236AHRQ HHS T32HS022236NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000133NCATS NIH HHS TL1TR000133NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000002NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000002NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR024145NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR024145-06NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceClostridium difficile is a major cause of health care-associated infection, but disagreement between diagnostic tests is an ongoing barrier to clinical decision making and public health reporting. Molecular tests are increasingly used to diagnose C difficile infection (CDI), but many molecular test-positive patients lack toxins that historically defined disease, making it unclear if they need treatment.

objectiveTo determine the natural history and need for treatment of patients who are toxin immunoassay negative and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive (Tox-/PCR+) for CDI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsProspective observational cohort study at a single academic medical center among 1416 hospitalized adults tested for C difficile toxins 72 hours or longer after admission between December 1, 2010, and October 20, 2012. The analysis was conducted in stages with revisions from April 27, 2013, to January 13, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients undergoing C difficile testing were grouped by US Food and Drug Administration-approved toxin and PCR tests as Tox+/PCR+, Tox-/PCR+, or Tox-/PCR-. Toxin results were reported clinically. Polymerase chain reaction results were not reported. The main study outcomes were duration of diarrhea during up to 14 days of treatment, rate of CDI-related complications (ie, colectomy, megacolon, or intensive care unit care) and CDI-related death within 30 days.

resultsTwenty-one percent (293 of 1416) of hospitalized adults tested for C difficile were positive by PCR, but 44.7% (131 of 293) had toxins detected by the clinical toxin test. At baseline, Tox-/PCR+ patients had lower C difficile bacterial load and less antibiotic exposure, fecal inflammation, and diarrhea than Tox+/PCR+ patients (P < .001 for all). The median duration of diarrhea was shorter in Tox-/PCR+ patients (2 days; interquartile range, 1-4 days) than in Tox+/PCR+ patients (3 days; interquartile range, 1-6 days) (P = .003) and was similar to that in Tox-/PCR- patients (2 days; interquartile range, 1-3 days), despite minimal empirical treatment of Tox-/PCR+ patients. No CDI-related complications occurred in Tox-/PCR+ patients vs 10 complications in Tox+/PCR+ patients (0% vs 7.6%, P < .001). One Tox-/PCR+ patient had recurrent CDI as a contributing factor to death within 30 days vs 11 CDI-related deaths in Tox+/PCR+ patients (0.6% vs 8.4%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among hospitalized adults with suspected CDI, virtually all CDI-related complications and deaths occurred in patients with positive toxin immunoassay test results. Patients with a positive molecular test result and a negative toxin immunoassay test result had outcomes that were comparable to patients without C difficile by either method. Exclusive reliance on molecular tests for CDI diagnosis without tests for toxins or host response is likely to result in overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and increased health care costs.

Indexed as

Clostridium InfectionsCross InfectionMedical OveruseAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Toxins

Identifiers

PMID26348734
PMCPMC4948649
OpenAlexW2167805911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.