ArticlePloS one2015
Deviance-Related Responses along the Auditory Hierarchy: Combined FFR, MLR and MMN Evidence.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid and Stimulus-Specific Deviance Detection in the Human Inferior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Validating a novel paradigm for simultaneously assessing mismatch response and frequency-following response to speech sounds.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024Article
- Brainstem speech encoding is dynamically shaped online by fluctuations in cortical α state.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Early Development of Neural Speech Encoding Depends on Age but Not Native Language Status: Evidence From Lexical Tone.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Adjudicating Between Local and Global Architectures of Predictive Processing in the Subcortical Auditory Pathway.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Review
- A generic deviance detection principle for cortical On/Off responses, omission response, and mismatch negativity.Biological cybernetics · 2019Article
- Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.Nature communications · 2019Review
- A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Effects of formant proximity and stimulus prototypicality on the neural discrimination of vowels: Evidence from the auditory frequency-following response.Brain and language · 2019Article
- Phonological Task Enhances the Frequency-Following Response to Deviant Task-Irrelevant Speech Sounds.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Monkeys share the neurophysiological basis for encoding sound periodicities captured by the frequency-following response with humans.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2017Article
- Timing predictability enhances regularity encoding in the human subcortical auditory pathway.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- The Neuronal Basis of Predictive Coding Along the Auditory Pathway: From the Subcortical Roots to Cortical Deviance Detection.Trends in hearingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mismatch negativity (MMN) provides a correlate of automatic auditory discrimination in human auditory cortex that is elicited in response to violation of any acoustic regularity. Recently, deviance-related responses were found at much earlier cortical processing stages as reflected by the middle latency response (MLR) of the auditory evoked potential, and even at the level of the auditory brainstem as reflected by the frequency following response (FFR). However, no study has reported deviance-related responses in the FFR, MLR and long latency response (LLR) concurrently in a single recording protocol. Amplitude-modulated (AM) sounds were presented to healthy human participants in a frequency oddball paradigm to investigate deviance-related responses along the auditory hierarchy in the ranges of FFR, MLR and LLR. AM frequency deviants modulated the FFR, the Na and Nb components of the MLR, and the LLR eliciting the MMN. These findings demonstrate that it is possible to elicit deviance-related responses at three different levels (FFR, MLR and LLR) in one single recording protocol, highlight the involvement of the whole auditory hierarchy in deviance detection and have implications for cognitive and clinical auditory neuroscience. Moreover, the present protocol provides a new research tool into clinical neuroscience so that the functional integrity of the auditory novelty system can now be tested as a whole in a range of clinical populations where the MMN was previously shown to be defective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.