Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26348482›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Common Ancestry Is a Poor Predictor of Competitive Traits in Freshwater Green Algae.

Anita Narwani, Markos A Alexandrou, James Herrin, Alaina Vouaux, Charles Zhou, Todd H Oakley, Bradley J Cardinale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Temporal encoding of bacterial identity and traits in growth dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anita NarwaniBU-G11 Überlandstrasse 133, Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology), 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland; 1556 Dana Building, 440 Church Street, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1041, United States of America.
Markos A Alexandrou4101 Life Sciences Building, UCEN Road, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States of America.
James Herrin1556 Dana Building, 440 Church Street, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1041, United States of America.
Alaina Vouaux1556 Dana Building, 440 Church Street, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1041, United States of America.
Charles Zhou1556 Dana Building, 440 Church Street, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1041, United States of America.
Todd H Oakley4101 Life Sciences Building, UCEN Road, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States of America.
Bradley J Cardinale1556 Dana Building, 440 Church Street, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1041, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoplankton species traits have been used to successfully predict the outcome of competition, but these traits are notoriously laborious to measure. If these traits display a phylogenetic signal, phylogenetic distance (PD) can be used as a proxy for trait variation. We provide the first investigation of the degree of phylogenetic signal in traits related to competition in freshwater green phytoplankton. We measured 17 traits related to competition and tested whether they displayed a phylogenetic signal across a molecular phylogeny of 59 species of green algae. We also assessed the fit of five models of trait evolution to trait variation across the phylogeny. There was no significant phylogenetic signal for 13 out of 17 ecological traits. For 7 traits, a non-phylogenetic model provided the best fit. For another 7 traits, a phylogenetic model was selected, but parameter values indicated that trait variation evolved recently, diminishing the importance of common ancestry. This study suggests that traits related to competition in freshwater green algae are not generally well-predicted by patterns of common ancestry. We discuss the mechanisms by which the link between phylogenetic distance and phenotypic differentiation may be broken.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyChlorophytaFresh WaterModels, TheoreticalNitratesPhenotypePhosphatesPhytoplanktonSpecies SpecificityNitratesPhosphates

Identifiers

PMID26348482
PMCPMC4562640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.