Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26347862›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2015

Use of Mesothelial Cells and Biological Matrices for Tissue Engineering of Simple Epithelium Surrogates.

Christian Claude Lachaud, Berta Rodriguez-Campins, Abdelkrim Hmadcha, Bernat Soria

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biphasic pleural mesothelioma in a goat.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian Claude LachaudAndalusian Center for Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine - Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa (CABIMER) , Seville , Spain ; Centro de Investigación en Red sobre Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (CIBERDEM) , Madrid , Spain.
Berta Rodriguez-CampinsDepartamento de I+D, New Biotechnic S.A. , Seville , Spain ; Fundación Andaluza de Investigación y Desarrollo (FAID) , Seville , Spain.
Abdelkrim HmadchaAndalusian Center for Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine - Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa (CABIMER) , Seville , Spain ; Centro de Investigación en Red sobre Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (CIBERDEM) , Madrid , Spain.
Bernat SoriaAndalusian Center for Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine - Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa (CABIMER) , Seville , Spain ; Centro de Investigación en Red sobre Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas (CIBERDEM) , Madrid , Spain.
Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas · ESNewbiotechnic (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue-engineering technologies have progressed rapidly through last decades resulting in the manufacture of quite complex bioartificial tissues with potential use for human organ and tissue regeneration. The manufacture of avascular monolayered tissues such as simple squamous epithelia was initiated a few decades ago and is attracting increasing interest. Their relative morphostructural simplicity makes of their biomimetization a goal, which is currently accessible. The mesothelium is a simple squamous epithelium in nature and is the monolayered tissue lining the walls of large celomic cavities (peritoneal, pericardial, and pleural) and internal organs housed inside. Interestingly, mesothelial cells can be harvested in clinically relevant numbers from several anatomical sources and not less important, they also display high transdifferentiation capacities and are low immunogenic characteristics, which endow these cells with therapeutic interest. Their combination with a suitable scaffold (biocompatible, degradable, and non-immunogenic) may allow the manufacture of tailored serosal membranes biomimetics with potential spanning a wide range of therapeutic applications, principally for the regeneration of simple squamous-like epithelia such as the visceral and parietal mesothelium vascular endothelium and corneal endothelium among others. Herein, we review recent research progresses in mesothelial cells biology and their clinical sources. We make a particular emphasis on reviewing the different types of biological scaffolds suitable for the manufacture of serosal mesothelial membranes biomimetics. Finally, we also review progresses made in mesothelial cells-based therapeutic applications and propose some possible future directions.

Indexed as

biological matricesbiomaterialscorneal endotheliumepithelial surrogatesmesothelial cellsserosal membranessimple epitheliatissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID26347862
PMCPMC4538307
OpenAlexW1565438397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.