Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26347749›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2015

Diversity and Inter-Connections in the CXCR4 Chemokine Receptor/Ligand Family: Molecular Perspectives.

Lukas Pawig, Christina Klasen, Christian Weber, Jürgen Bernhagen, Heidi Noels

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 199 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. mBio · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A scoping review on potential of novel developments in fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin: long-axial-field-of-view positron emission tomography/computed tomography and novel radiotracers.The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of... · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The roles of neutrophils in cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lukas PawigInstitute of Molecular Cardiovascular Research (IMCAR), RWTH Aachen University , Aachen , Germany.
Christina KlasenInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, RWTH Aachen University , Aachen , Germany.
Christian WeberInstitute for Cardiovascular Prevention (IPEK), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich , Munich , Germany ; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance , Munich , Germany ; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University , Maastricht , Netherlands.
Jürgen BernhagenInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, RWTH Aachen University , Aachen , Germany ; August-Lenz-Stiftung, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich , Munich , Germany.
Heidi NoelsInstitute of Molecular Cardiovascular Research (IMCAR), RWTH Aachen University , Aachen , Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

European Research Council 249929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 mediate the homing of progenitor cells in the bone marrow and their recruitment to sites of injury, as well as affect processes such as cell arrest, survival, and angiogenesis. CXCL12 was long thought to be the sole CXCR4 ligand, but more recently the atypical chemokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) was identified as an alternative, non-cognate ligand for CXCR4 and shown to mediate chemotaxis and arrest of CXCR4-expressing T-cells. This has complicated the understanding of CXCR4-mediated signaling and associated biological processes. Compared to CXCL12/CXCR4-induced signaling, only few details are known on MIF/CXCR4-mediated signaling and it remains unclear to which extent MIF and CXCL12 reciprocally influence CXCR4 binding and signaling. Furthermore, the atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3) (previously CXCR7) has added to the complexity of CXCR4 signaling due to its ability to bind CXCL12 and MIF, and to evoke CXCL12- and MIF-triggered signaling independently of CXCR4. Also, extracellular ubiquitin (eUb) and the viral protein gp120 (HIV) have been reported as CXCR4 ligands, whereas viral chemokine vMIP-II (Herpesvirus) and human β3-defensin (HBD-3) have been identified as CXCR4 antagonists. This review will provide insight into the diversity and inter-connections in the CXCR4 receptor/ligand family. We will discuss signaling pathways initiated by binding of CXCL12 vs. MIF to CXCR4, elaborate on how ACKR3 affects CXCR4 signaling, and summarize biological functions of CXCR4 signaling mediated by CXCL12 or MIF. Also, we will discuss eUb and gp120 as alternative ligands for CXCR4, and describe vMIP-II and HBD-3 as antagonists for CXCR4. Detailed insight into biological effects of CXCR4 signaling und underlying mechanisms, including diversity of CXCR4 ligands and inter-connections with other (chemokine) receptors, is clinically important, as the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 has been approved as stem cell mobilizer in specific disease settings.

Indexed as

ACKR3chemokineCXCL12CXCR4CXCR7MIFsignalingubiquitin

Identifiers

PMID26347749
PMCPMC4543903
OpenAlexW1846616615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.