Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26347689›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

Brief learning induces a memory bias for arousing-negative words: an fMRI study in high and low trait anxious persons.

Annuschka S Eden, Vera Dehmelt, Matthias Bischoff, Pienie Zwitserlood, Harald Kugel, Kati Keuper, Peter Zwanzger, Christian Dobel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Annuschka S EdenInstitute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital of Münster Münster, Germany ; Institute of Psychology, University of Münster Münster, Germany.
Vera DehmeltInstitute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital of Münster Münster, Germany ; Institute of Psychology, University of Münster Münster, Germany.
Matthias BischoffInstitute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Münster Münster, Germany.
Pienie ZwitserloodDepartment of Psycholinguistics and Cognitive Neurosciences, Institute of Psychology, University of Münster Münster, Germany.
Harald KugelDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University of Münster Münster, Germany.
Kati KeuperUniversity of Hong Kong Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Peter Zwanzgerkbo-Inn-Salzach Clinic, Academic Hospital of Psychiatry, Psychotheray and Neurology Wasserburg am Inn, Germany.
Christian DobelInstitute of Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital of Münster Münster, Germany ; Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld Bielefeld, Germany ; Department of Otolaryngology, Jena University Hospital Jena, Germany.
University of Münster · DEInn-Salzach-Klinikum · DEJena University Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persons suffering from anxiety disorders display facilitated processing of arousing and negative stimuli, such as negative words. This memory bias is reflected in better recall and increased amygdala activity in response to such stimuli. However, individual learning histories were not considered in most studies, a concern that we meet here. Thirty-four female persons (half with high-, half with low trait anxiety) participated in a criterion-based associative word-learning paradigm, in which neutral pseudowords were paired with aversive or neutral pictures, which should lead to a valence change for the negatively paired pseudowords. After learning, pseudowords were tested with fMRI to investigate differential brain activation of the amygdala evoked by the newly acquired valence. Explicit and implicit memory was assessed directly after training and in three follow-ups at 4-day intervals. The behavioral results demonstrate that associative word-learning leads to an explicit (but no implicit) memory bias for negatively linked pseudowords, relative to neutral ones, which confirms earlier studies. Bilateral amygdala activation underlines the behavioral effect: Higher trait anxiety is correlated with stronger amygdala activation for negatively linked pseudowords than for neutrally linked ones. Most interestingly, this effect is also present for negatively paired pseudowords that participants could not remember well. Moreover, neutrally paired pseudowords evoked higher amygdala reactivity than completely novel ones in highly anxious persons, which can be taken as evidence for generalization. These findings demonstrate that few word-learning trials generate a memory bias for emotional stimuli, indexed both behaviorally and neurophysiologically. Importantly, the typical memory bias for emotional stimuli and the generalization to neutral ones is larger in high anxious persons.

Indexed as

amygdalaconsolidationemotionsfMRImemory biasstatistical word-learningtrait anxiety

Identifiers

PMID26347689
PMCPMC4543815
OpenAlexW1833918721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.