Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26347618›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015

Potential implications of a monosynaptic pathway from mossy cells to adult-born granule cells of the dentate gyrus.

Helen E Scharfman, Hannah L Bernstein

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bidirectional Regulation of Cognitive and Anxiety-like Behaviors by Dentate Gyrus Mossy Cells in Male and Female Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Controlling learning and epilepsy together.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The enigmatic mossy cell of the dentate gyrus.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helen E ScharfmanThe Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg NY, USA ; New York University Langone Medical Center, New York NY, USA.
Hannah L BernsteinThe Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg NY, USA ; New York University Langone Medical Center, New York NY, USA.
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAININGT32GM007308 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PHILIPS, MARK REID · 1985 to 2019
$23.2M
Diverse Roles of Adult Dentate Gyrus NeurogenesisR01NS081203 · NINDS · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI SCHARFMAN, HELEN E · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007308NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dentate gyrus (DG) is important to many aspects of hippocampal function, but there are many aspects of the DG that are incompletely understood. One example is the role of mossy cells (MCs), a major DG cell type that is glutamatergic and innervates the primary output cells of the DG, the granule cells (GCs). MCs innervate the GCs as well as local circuit neurons that make GABAergic synapses on GCs, so the net effect of MCs on GCs - and therefore the output of the DG - is unclear. Here we first review fundamental information about MCs and the current hypotheses for their role in the normal DG and in diseases that involve the DG. Then we review previously published data which suggest that MCs are a source of input to a subset of GCs that are born in adulthood (adult-born GCs). In addition, we discuss the evidence that adult-born GCs may support the normal inhibitory 'gate' functions of the DG, where the GCs are a filter or gate for information from the entorhinal cortical input to area CA3. The implications are then discussed in the context of seizures and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). In TLE, it has been suggested that the DG inhibitory gate is weak or broken and MC loss leads to insufficient activation of inhibitory neurons, causing hyperexcitability. That idea was called the "dormant basket cell hypothesis." Recent data suggest that loss of normal adult-born GCs may also cause disinhibition, and seizure susceptibility. Therefore, we propose a reconsideration of the dormant basket cell hypothesis with an intervening adult-born GC between the MC and basket cell and call this hypothesis the "dormant immature granule cell hypothesis."

Indexed as

adult neurogenesisdepressionepilepsyhippocampuspattern separationpsychiatryseizurespatial memory

Identifiers

PMID26347618
PMCPMC4541026
OpenAlexW1651628435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.