Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26347603›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2015

A pilot study into the effects of music therapy on different areas of the brain of individuals with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome.

Nikolaus Steinhoff, Astrid M Heine, Julia Vogl, Konrad Weiss, Asita Aschraf, Paul Hajek, Peter Schnider, Gerhard Tucek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Techniques of cognitive rehabilitation in patients with disorders of consciousness: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The Role of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. The Cerebellum in Musicology: a Narrative Review.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Music and the Cerebellum.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Current and Future Perspectives of the Cerebellum in Affective Neuroscience.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Emotional consciousness preserved in patients with disorders of consciousness?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolaus SteinhoffOptimaMed Neurological Rehabilitation Kittsee, Austria.
Astrid M HeineDepartment of Music Therapy, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Austria.
Julia VoglDepartment of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.
Konrad WeissDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Regional Hospital Wiener Neustadt Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Asita AschrafDepartment of Neurology, Regional Hospital Hochegg Grimmenstein, Austria.
Paul HajekDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Regional Hospital Wiener Neustadt Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Peter SchniderDepartment of Neurology, Regional Hospital Hochegg Grimmenstein, Austria.
Gerhard TucekDepartment of Music Therapy, IMC University of Applied Sciences Krems, Austria.
Fachhochschule Wiener Neustadt · ATIMC University of Applied Sciences Krems · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global cerebral network allows music " to do to us what it does." While the same music can cause different emotions, the basic emotion of happy and sad songs can, nevertheless, be understood by most people. Consequently, the individual experience of music and its common effect on the human brain is a challenging subject for research. Various activities such as hearing, processing, and performing music provide us with different pictures of cerebral centers in PET. In comparison to these simple acts of experiencing music, the interaction and the therapeutic relationship between the patient and the therapist in Music Therapy (MT) provide us with an additional element in need of investigation. In the course of a pilot study, these problems were approached and reduced to the simple observation of pattern alteration in the brains of four individuals with Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS) during MT. Each patient had three PET investigations: (i) during a resting state, (ii) during the first exposure to MT, and (iii) during the last exposure to MT. Two patients in the MT group received MT for 5 weeks between the 2nd and the 3rd PET (three times a week), while two other patients in the control group had no MT in between. Tracer uptake was measured in the frontal, hippocampal, and cerebellar region of the brain. With certain differences in these three observed brain areas, the tracer uptake in the MT group was higher (34%) than in the control group after 5 weeks. The preliminary results suggest that MT activates the three brain regions described above. In this article, we present our approach to the neuroscience of MT and discuss the impact of our hypothesis on music therapy practice, neurological rehabilitation of individuals in UWS and additional neuroscientific research.

Indexed as

activity alterationbrain areashuman brainmusic therapypositron emission tomography (PET)

Identifiers

PMID26347603
PMCPMC4543917
OpenAlexW1703287952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.